Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
The article currently includes about 13 sentences directly quoting ]. I consider this excessive and approaching copyright violation territory. Why can't we summarize and paraphrase what Mickelson says, and only include a brief quote or two, when he says something that is not PR speak? ] (]) 03:50, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
The article currently includes about 13 sentences directly quoting ]. I consider this excessive and approaching copyright violation territory. Why can't we summarize and paraphrase what Mickelson says, and only include a brief quote or two, when he says something that is not PR speak? ] (]) 03:50, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
:It's not just the number of quotations that is excessive – the entire Mickelson section is undue and should probably be reduced to a maximum of two paragraphs. <sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 09:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Revision as of 09:32, 29 July 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LIV Golf article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Translate the page of sport in each country from corresponding article in other language Misplaced Pages to English Misplaced Pages which was marked in red.
Categorize: Gather all (major/olympic) sports to be part of this project
PIF's investment portfolio does not seem to have any direct relevance to LIV Golf, other than whataboutery, yet it has been persistently added. Additionally, mainstream reliable sources are not routinely listing PIF's investment portfolio in the context of LIV Golf, therefore it seems to me that nor should we, per WP:UNDUE. PIF should of course remain mentioned; it is only the addition of a list of select unrelated PIF investments (Boeing, FB, Citigroup, Disney, BoA, Live Nation, Berkshire Hathaway, BP, Uber) that would be reverted/removed. Thoughts please. wjemather08:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Clearly not suitable for inclusion here (and even less so in the Greg Norman article). There is an article on the Public Investment Fund where it could be included. This article is about LIV golf, not a place to get into details of other PIF investments. Nigej (talk) 09:10, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Excessive quotations by Phil Mickelson
The article currently includes about 13 sentences directly quoting Phil Mickelson. I consider this excessive and approaching copyright violation territory. Why can't we summarize and paraphrase what Mickelson says, and only include a brief quote or two, when he says something that is not PR speak? Cullen328 (talk) 03:50, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
It's not just the number of quotations that is excessive – the entire Mickelson section is undue and should probably be reduced to a maximum of two paragraphs. wjemather09:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
