Revision as of 15:18, 3 March 2007 editAngusmclellan (talk | contribs)64,067 edits →Book of Lismore: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:18, 3 March 2007 edit undoAngusmclellan (talk | contribs)64,067 editsm →Book of Lismore: fmtNext edit → | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
It may be that I'm being unreasonably strict, but the ] article seems to me to be too close to . ] ] 14:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | It may be that I'm being unreasonably strict, but the ] article seems to me to be too close to . ] ] 14:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Well, currently it's hiding its light under a bushel. All that anyone will see on the page is a dirty great {{tl|copyvio}} template. There's a fine big modern article that could be paraphrased easy enough, and parts of the book are online at and in public-domain translations by ]. ] ] 15:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | :Well, currently it's hiding its light under a bushel. All that anyone will see on the page is a dirty great {{tl|copyvio}} template. There's a fine big modern article that could be paraphrased easy enough, and parts of the book are online at and in public-domain translations by ]. ] ] 15:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:18, 3 March 2007
|
Scotland
Hi, Monopingo - I'm wondering what's up with your removing mentions of Scotland from various Celtic and Gaelic articles? Many of the topics you're editing are part of both Irish and Scottish history, mythology and culture. I seriously don't think anyone is going to think one is being denigrated if both are included. Slán ~ Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 00:15, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Template:Celtic mythology. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~ Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 00:54, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Template:Celtic mythology, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. ~ Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 02:48, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Book of Lismore
It may be that I'm being unreasonably strict, but the Book of Lismore article seems to me to be too close to this. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Well, currently it's hiding its light under a bushel. All that anyone will see on the page is a dirty great {{copyvio}} template. There's a fine big modern article here that could be paraphrased easy enough, and parts of the book are online at CELT and Lampeter University in public-domain translations by Whitley Stokes. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)