| Revision as of 00:36, 29 November 2022 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,141,424 edits →ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message: new sectionTags: Reverted MassMessage delivery← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:02, 29 November 2022 edit undoBilCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers215,892 edits Undid revision 1124461868 by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) notedTag: UndoNext edit → | ||
| Line 141: | Line 141: | ||
| In case you weren't aware, there's going on that you may be interested in. ] (]) 00:04, 28 November 2022 (UTC) | In case you weren't aware, there's going on that you may be interested in. ] (]) 00:04, 28 November 2022 (UTC) | ||
| :{{u|Fred Zepelin}}, thanks. I had already seen it, and am keeping track of it. I'll comment later on if warranted. ] (]) 00:08, 28 November 2022 (UTC) | :{{u|Fred Zepelin}}, thanks. I had already seen it, and am keeping track of it. I'll comment later on if warranted. ] (]) 00:08, 28 November 2022 (UTC) | ||
| == ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1124425183 --> | |||
Revision as of 01:02, 29 November 2022
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
 | Before posting, please read and follow the notes below.
|
 Archives |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Thanks!
... for extensive support, it was most welcome and supportive! Jan olieslagers (talk) 19:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- You're most welcome! BilCat (talk) 19:58, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Problem with the perspective you hold.
The Ar wiki is about the Ar gun series, not the term and history of the slang word ¨AR¨ and its meaning, refrain from editing and reverting terms that don't comply or follow the main point of the article.
Like really. AR is the company and the wiki page is about the company and gun series.
Its not talking about the guns in the category of assault rifle like the Ak-47 and STG-44 would be in.
Thank you. Gun Nut perk (talk) 04:44, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- The issue has been discussed many times at Talk:AR-15 style rifle, and you're welcome to discuss any issues you have there. But you're not welcome to continue to edit war, as you're doing in several articles today. You're risking getting blocked. BilCat (talk) 04:48, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Disputed primary topics
Do you think Talk:Taps (bugle call)#Requested move 30 October 2022 it a good example of a disputed primary topic? Although unlike Memphis it hadn't been raised before the fact that it was argued by usage a different topic was primary if anything and by long-term significance a different could also be primary if anything suggests disambiguation is the best option? Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I'm not quite sure what you're asking. The last sentence is a bit hard to follow. BilCat (talk) 23:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- I was pointing out that if there are arguments that suggest different topics are primary it is very likely disambiguation is the best compromise similar to the fact people claimed the other Memphis could be primary but we realized the best bet is to have no primary topic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:13, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
No
It was not a test. 😐 PlaneCrashKing1264 (talk) 03:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Whatever you call it, it was unhelpful. BilCat (talk) 04:45, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
"Hot Stuff" aircraft
Why was my edit deemed not worthy? I am sorry if I messed up or made a big mistake but that plane's final flight manifest is an important added section and adds a lot to the article. Nimuda (talk) 12:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
R44
Considering this made not just local news but NY Times, Associate Press, CNN, and a few others I hadn't yet had time to link, this seems like it might be a case for an exception to the guidelines if the blurb is shortened - the nationwide news apparently thinks this is pretty noteworthy. Especially since two News station employees were involved - that IS out of the ordinary. And if the pilot did deliberately try to save the cars below, as several witnesses to the crash claim he did, that seems something worthy of remembrance as well. EEBuchanan (talk) 05:00, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Please make your case for inclusion on the articles talk page. We generally go by the guidelines at WP:AIRCRASH. Please note that Misplaced Pages isn't a news source or a memorial. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 05:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ok Duly noted. Others (one an admin) have put it on the WCNC page so I updated it with the citations I had. I guess it goes there. It is something at least important in the history of the station, but if WP policy dictates it isn't in the history of the aircraft type that's all right. EEBuchanan (talk) 05:12, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'm sure others are keeping an eye on the incident. It wouldn't take much more to push it over the notability threshold. BilCat (talk) 05:26, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Again duly noted. I actually live near where the crash happened and work just down the street from it, so I can keep a pretty close eye on things myself. FAA/NTSB investigations have always fascinated me.
- EEBuchanan (talk) 05:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'm sure others are keeping an eye on the incident. It wouldn't take much more to push it over the notability threshold. BilCat (talk) 05:26, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
After all that work on Visual Editor you might be thirsty...tell no one where you left the "body" Unbroken Chain (talk) 06:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks, as long as it's non-alcoholic. BilCat (talk) 07:00, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
- Only the best O'douls for you ;) I can't drink much beer anymore either. Stupid diabetes ;) Unbroken Chain (talk) 17:46, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Baseball
In case you weren't aware, there's a discussion going on that you may be interested in. Fred Zepelin (talk) 00:04, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
- Fred Zepelin, thanks. I had already seen it, and am keeping track of it. I'll comment later on if warranted. BilCat (talk) 00:08, 28 November 2022 (UTC)