| Revision as of 15:59, 8 December 2022 editYamla (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators148,019 edits Decline← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:48, 8 December 2022 edit undo71.49.192.248 (talk) →Unblock request: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed |1=Yeah but in this case it IS them. A few users that are benefiting from bias keep reverting my valid edits out of spite and getting away with it. ] (]) 15:36, 8 December 2022 (UTC) |decline = This approach isn't working for you. ] (]) 15:59, 8 December 2022 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed |1=Yeah but in this case it IS them. A few users that are benefiting from bias keep reverting my valid edits out of spite and getting away with it. ] (]) 15:36, 8 December 2022 (UTC) |decline = This approach isn't working for you. ] (]) 15:59, 8 December 2022 (UTC)}} | ||
| You obviously haven't read ] or my comments here for that matter. You were blocked for what you did, not for what others did. Your request should only address what you did. If you wish to report the inappropriate conduct of others, you may do so once unblocked(though ]). ] (]) 15:46, 8 December 2022 (UTC) | You obviously haven't read ] or my comments here for that matter. You were blocked for what you did, not for what others did. Your request should only address what you did. If you wish to report the inappropriate conduct of others, you may do so once unblocked(though ]). ] (]) 15:46, 8 December 2022 (UTC) | ||
| == Unblock request == | |||
| {{unblock|reason="Yamla said: This approach isn't working for you." | |||
| To be fair, I also tried being constructive and that didn't work either so... Did you ever consider the problem IS the other users? ] (]) 20:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)}} ] (]) 20:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:48, 8 December 2022
Another sock of User:Kompress0
— Jacona (talk) 14:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- What are you saying? You don't like someone following you around reverting your edits? 71.49.192.248 (talk) 14:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- I have blocked you for 48 hours. PhilKnight (talk) 15:03, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah but see you're not privy to the whole situation. Jacona and wolfchild have been harassing me for months, the only difference is they're established users so they get away with it. 71.49.192.248 (talk) 15:05, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- I have blocked you for 48 hours. PhilKnight (talk) 15:03, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Unblock Request Too
71.49.192.248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'd be glad to go back to being a contributing member here, if Jacona and wolfchild will get over their spite and leave my valid edits alone 71.49.192.248 (talk) 15:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Requests with personal attacks are not considered. 331dot (talk) 15:12, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock Three
71.49.192.248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
You know it would save a LOT of time in the future for Jacona and wolfchild just to be instructed to leave my valid edits alone 71.49.192.248 (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See WP:NOTTHEM. 331dot (talk) 15:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You don't need to sign your request both inside and outside it. 331dot (talk) 15:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Unblock request
71.49.192.248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yeah but in this case it IS them. A few users that are benefiting from bias keep reverting my valid edits out of spite and getting away with it. 71.49.192.248 (talk) 15:36, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This approach isn't working for you. Yamla (talk) 15:59, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You obviously haven't read WP:NOTTHEM or my comments here for that matter. You were blocked for what you did, not for what others did. Your request should only address what you did. If you wish to report the inappropriate conduct of others, you may do so once unblocked(though I would advise against it). 331dot (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Unblock request
71.49.192.248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
"Yamla said: This approach isn't working for you." To be fair, I also tried being constructive and that didn't work either so... Did you ever consider the problem IS the other users? 71.49.192.248 (talk) 20:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2="Yamla said: This approach isn't working for you." To be fair, I also tried being constructive and that didn't work either so... Did you ever consider the problem IS the other users? ] (]) 20:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1="Yamla said: This approach isn't working for you." To be fair, I also tried being constructive and that didn't work either so... Did you ever consider the problem IS the other users? ] (]) 20:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1="Yamla said: This approach isn't working for you." To be fair, I also tried being constructive and that didn't work either so... Did you ever consider the problem IS the other users? ] (]) 20:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
71.49.192.248 (talk) 20:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Category: