| Revision as of 23:36, 4 March 2007 editOne Night In Hackney (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,879 edits →Comments from One Night In Hackney: Quick reply to Setanta747← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:02, 5 March 2007 edit undoTyrenius (talk | contribs)37,867 edits :It is essential that editors WP:AGF. Good editors add to articles to improve them, regardless of their own personal opinions. ~~~~Next edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| The "''anti-Irish'' POV" is actually a mistake on my part, it should have Republicanism added to it. I don't personally feel the aim of the project is to ''promote'' Irish Republicanism, but to improve the articles relating to it and add relevant articles. This is certainly what I have been trying to do, as can be seen by my contributions. <font face="Verdana">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 23:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC) | The "''anti-Irish'' POV" is actually a mistake on my part, it should have Republicanism added to it. I don't personally feel the aim of the project is to ''promote'' Irish Republicanism, but to improve the articles relating to it and add relevant articles. This is certainly what I have been trying to do, as can be seen by my contributions. <font face="Verdana">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 23:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :It is essential that editors ]. Good editors add to articles to improve them, regardless of their own personal opinions. ] 04:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:02, 5 March 2007
Moved from project page
This was inserted as a threaded post under outside view by Kittybrewster. Threaded posts are not allowed in RfC, only statements and endorsements. Tyrenius 22:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- I try to bring balance to articles on Irish republicanism as many of these articles can be very unbalanced, additionally I have reported ONLY ever reported editors for breach of policy not their views.--Vintagekits 14:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
End of copied post
Comments from One Night In Hackney
With regard to multiple points by User:Kittybrewster:
The claim of me stalking is incorrect. Anyone is welcome to check through my contributions and see that I have added {{WP:IR}} to the talk pages of many, many Irish Republicanism articles, and I watchlisted them at the same time.
The Irish Republican Army are not a terrorist organisation, which is what IRA referred to. Had my signature been PIRA that would have been an entirely different situation altogether, but multiple editors failed to assume good faith. I offered to remove my signature within minutes of the matter being raised on ANI, and was told there was no immediate requirement to remove it. Despite this I removed the signature as a gesture of good faith while discussion was ongoing. I do not consider the 1916 signature to be contentious, and other editors agreed. I do not consider the use of 1916 in a signature to be a violation of WP:POINT (and certainly not WP:CIVIL or WP:NPOV), and it is curious that supporters of Astrotrain single out my signature while ignoring the multiple WP:POINT, WP:CIVIL and WP:NPOV violations Astrotrain has committed.
As for 303 referring to rifling, you are a long way off the mark. My username is a song, and 303 refers to the Roland TB-303 which is used in the production of the song.
Myself and Vintagekits are not acting in consort with each other, as this discussion adequately demonstrates.
With regards to me having different views to Astrotrain on notability, quite possibly yes. I tend to use Misplaced Pages guidelines on notability to determine what is notable and what is not, whereas based on the evidence provided Astotrain clearly does not. One Night In Hackney303 23:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Quick reply to Setanta747:
The "anti-Irish POV" is actually a mistake on my part, it should have Republicanism added to it. I don't personally feel the aim of the project is to promote Irish Republicanism, but to improve the articles relating to it and add relevant articles. This is certainly what I have been trying to do, as can be seen by my contributions. One Night In Hackney303 23:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- It is essential that editors AGF. Good editors add to articles to improve them, regardless of their own personal opinions. Tyrenius 04:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)