Revision as of 00:47, 29 January 2023 editMilHistBot (talk | contribs)Bots141,189 edits Automatic MILHIST checklist assessment - C class← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:12, 11 June 2023 edit undo76.210.138.86 (talk) →New study apparently confirming that sarin exposure was responsible + genetic factor in the form of GWS sufferers having a less effective version of the PON1 gene: ReplyTags: Reverted ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
::. Appears to violate ] because it is a single study rather than a ] covering a biomedical topic. Also the text we added to the article is quite technical. I'm leaning toward removing it, but figured I'd come to the talk page first. Single studies can be quite untrustworthy, ] where I talk about this a bit. As a compromise, we could condense the added text down to one sentence, for example, "A 2022 study found a possible link between GWS and exposure to low levels of sarin, which was released into the air by coalition bombing of Iraqi chemical weapons facilities." The lower weight and addition of the word "possibly" would make our text more reflective of the potential inaccuracy of the study. –] <small>(])</small> 04:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC) | ::. Appears to violate ] because it is a single study rather than a ] covering a biomedical topic. Also the text we added to the article is quite technical. I'm leaning toward removing it, but figured I'd come to the talk page first. Single studies can be quite untrustworthy, ] where I talk about this a bit. As a compromise, we could condense the added text down to one sentence, for example, "A 2022 study found a possible link between GWS and exposure to low levels of sarin, which was released into the air by coalition bombing of Iraqi chemical weapons facilities." The lower weight and addition of the word "possibly" would make our text more reflective of the potential inaccuracy of the study. –] <small>(])</small> 04:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
:::If I'm not mistaken, you would have to gut virtually the entire page and start from scratch (]) in order to satisfy the ] criterion for inclusion.] (]) 04:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC) | :::If I'm not mistaken, you would have to gut virtually the entire page and start from scratch (]) in order to satisfy the ] criterion for inclusion.] (]) 04:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
::::Why have you not updated this? This has been conclusively proven to the be the cause, just like in 2021 Prof Randall Parrish conclusively proved that depleted uranium had nothing to do with causing Gulf War Illness. Why is this page still titled Gulf War Syndrome about a decade after it was renamed Gulf War Illness, which is an upgrade of the term syndrome. There is no potential inaccuracy of the study unless you are with the ICBUW who went out soliciting naysayers because they really like to falsely claim that depleted uranium has caused Gulf War Syndrome and thousands of soldier deaths. It really helps them sell their big lie which began with Saddam Hussein's propagandists in 1991 and still lives today in Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 23:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:12, 11 June 2023
Gulf War syndrome was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
Medicine: Genetics B‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Military history: Logistics / Middle East C‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Ideal sources for Misplaced Pages's health content are defined in the guideline Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Gulf War syndrome.
|
This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary. |
Archives | |||||
Index
|
|||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Contradiction on PTSD incidence between paragraph 2 & 4
Paragraph 2 says: From 1995 to 2005, the health of combat veterans worsened in comparison with nondeployed veterans, with the onset of more new chronic diseases, . . . posttraumatic stress disorder (emphasis added)
Paragraph 4 says: Studies have consistently indicated that . . . Gulf War veterans have lower rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than veterans of other wars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:285:8200:D250:7176:89E6:7AC3:59EA (talk) 02:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
IOM sources
— Preceding unsigned comment added by WLU (talk • contribs)
Do Iraqi soldiers suffer from Gulf War Syndrome?
As above. I'm quite surprised that nobody appears to have addressed this issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.136.111.169 (talk) 21:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Possible typo
It seems there is a typo in the name used by the Veteran's affairs office. The phrase "medically unexplained illnesses" appears twice in a row.
Current: "Gulf War veterans' medically unexplained illnesses, medically unexplained illnesses, chronic multi-symptom illness (CMI)"
Suggested: "Gulf War veterans' medically unexplained illnesses, chronic multi-symptom illness (CMI)"
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
68.185.39.54 (talk) 06:12, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Is Gulf War Syndrome related to Burn Pits?
I was led here after watching a medical video regarding the phenomenon of increased incidence of cancer in US servicemembers exposed to the practice of incinerating garbage, chemicals, UXO, etc. in Burn Pits using benzene-containing JP-8, and I'm looking at the 1991 photo on the Burn Pit page and going "hmmm". Dionaeahouse (talk) 01:22, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
New study apparently confirming that sarin exposure was responsible + genetic factor in the form of GWS sufferers having a less effective version of the PON1 gene
Sarin gas blamed for Gulf War syndrome (BBC News, 11 May 2022) Now, the Beeb is a (mostly) reliable source, but should we or shouldn't we wait for a few more sources to provide coverage before adding this? - Dvaderv2 (talk) 08:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- I'm reading through the study now and I definitely think that it deserves to be included here in some form.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 21:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Diff. Appears to violate WP:MEDRS because it is a single study rather than a review article covering a biomedical topic. Also the text we added to the article is quite technical. I'm leaning toward removing it, but figured I'd come to the talk page first. Single studies can be quite untrustworthy, here's an essay where I talk about this a bit. As a compromise, we could condense the added text down to one sentence, for example, "A 2022 study found a possible link between GWS and exposure to low levels of sarin, which was released into the air by coalition bombing of Iraqi chemical weapons facilities." The lower weight and addition of the word "possibly" would make our text more reflective of the potential inaccuracy of the study. –Novem Linguae (talk) 04:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- If I'm not mistaken, you would have to gut virtually the entire page and start from scratch (WP:TNT) in order to satisfy the review article criterion for inclusion.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 04:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Why have you not updated this? This has been conclusively proven to the be the cause, just like in 2021 Prof Randall Parrish conclusively proved that depleted uranium had nothing to do with causing Gulf War Illness. Why is this page still titled Gulf War Syndrome about a decade after it was renamed Gulf War Illness, which is an upgrade of the term syndrome. There is no potential inaccuracy of the study unless you are with the ICBUW who went out soliciting naysayers because they really like to falsely claim that depleted uranium has caused Gulf War Syndrome and thousands of soldier deaths. It really helps them sell their big lie which began with Saddam Hussein's propagandists in 1991 and still lives today in Misplaced Pages. 76.210.138.86 (talk) 23:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- If I'm not mistaken, you would have to gut virtually the entire page and start from scratch (WP:TNT) in order to satisfy the review article criterion for inclusion.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 04:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Diff. Appears to violate WP:MEDRS because it is a single study rather than a review article covering a biomedical topic. Also the text we added to the article is quite technical. I'm leaning toward removing it, but figured I'd come to the talk page first. Single studies can be quite untrustworthy, here's an essay where I talk about this a bit. As a compromise, we could condense the added text down to one sentence, for example, "A 2022 study found a possible link between GWS and exposure to low levels of sarin, which was released into the air by coalition bombing of Iraqi chemical weapons facilities." The lower weight and addition of the word "possibly" would make our text more reflective of the potential inaccuracy of the study. –Novem Linguae (talk) 04:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- B-Class medical genetics articles
- Unknown-importance medical genetics articles
- Medical genetics task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military logistics and medicine articles
- Military logistics and medicine task force articles
- C-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- Misplaced Pages pages referenced by the press
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics