Misplaced Pages

Talk:Glaukopis: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:44, 19 February 2023 editTrangaBellam (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,563 edits →To use: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Revision as of 14:51, 19 February 2023 edit undoTrangaBellam (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,563 edits →Polish version: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
* 10.18318/td.2016.en.1.4 * 10.18318/td.2016.en.1.4
] (]) 12:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC) ] (]) 12:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

== Polish version ==

It has no information that suggests this en-wiki article to be NPOV. My analysis of the paragraphs:
:* An unsourced paragraph on the aims of the journal, probably quoted from their website.
:* An unsourced paragraph about the various people who are affiliated to them, probably quoted from their website.
:* A paragraph that vouches for the reliability of the journal by citing a communique from a Polish Ministry. Then, there are details about accessing back-issues.
:* A one-line paragraph about an award.
:* A one-line paragraph about their EiC(s), probably quoted from their website.
:* A list of books published by the journal.
] (]) 14:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:51, 19 February 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glaukopis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

To use

  • 10.18318/td.2016.en.1.4

TrangaBellam (talk) 12:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Polish version

It has no information that suggests this en-wiki article to be NPOV. My analysis of the paragraphs:

  • An unsourced paragraph on the aims of the journal, probably quoted from their website.
  • An unsourced paragraph about the various people who are affiliated to them, probably quoted from their website.
  • A paragraph that vouches for the reliability of the journal by citing a communique from a Polish Ministry. Then, there are details about accessing back-issues.
  • A one-line paragraph about an award.
  • A one-line paragraph about their EiC(s), probably quoted from their website.
  • A list of books published by the journal.

TrangaBellam (talk) 14:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)