Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ytrezq: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:47, 12 May 2023 editYtrezq (talk | contribs)45 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 20:55, 12 May 2023 edit undoMrOllie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers237,514 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


] Hello, Ytrezq, ] and thank you for ]. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Misplaced Pages. Our ] usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be ]. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please ] these connections. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-agf-sock --> ] (]) 17:58, 12 May 2023 (UTC) ] Hello, Ytrezq, ] and thank you for ]. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Misplaced Pages. Our ] usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be ]. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please ] these connections. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-agf-sock --> ] (]) 17:58, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
:: Correct, we’re a group of over 1000 users which include Roman Semenov (1 of the original developpers) who think that the article says is in great part, wrong. Having reliable links is important in order to avoid users being scammed when they search for sources. Outside what was sized by the sanctions, we’re not a fork : we’re using the same funds and the shareholders and even the same ɪᴘꜰꜱ website as before the sanctions. It’s true the old team disbanded, but you can’t censor an ] that continued allocating funds for the project to developers. :: Correct, we’re a group of over 1000 users which include Roman Semenov (1 of the original developpers) who think that the article says is in great part, wrong. Having reliable links is important in order to avoid users being scammed when they search for sources. Outside what was sized by the sanctions, we’re not a fork : we’re using the same funds and the shareholders and even the same ɪᴘꜰꜱ website as before the sanctions. It’s true the old team disbanded, but you can’t censor an ] that continued allocating funds for the project to developers. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small>

:Misplaced Pages requires sourcing, you will not be able to change the article until ] (such as mainstream news outlets, not crypto blogs) take notice of these changes. Also see ], if you are involved with this 'group' you should not be editing the article yourself. - ] (]) 20:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:55, 12 May 2023

May 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Misplaced Pages as a "soapbox" are against Misplaced Pages policy and not permitted; Misplaced Pages articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Misplaced Pages. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 17:57, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, Ytrezq, welcome to Misplaced Pages and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Misplaced Pages. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 17:58, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Correct, we’re a group of over 1000 users which include Roman Semenov (1 of the original developpers) who think that the article says is in great part, wrong. Having reliable links is important in order to avoid users being scammed when they search for sources. Outside what was sized by the sanctions, we’re not a fork : we’re using the same funds and the shareholders and even the same ɪᴘꜰꜱ website as before the sanctions. It’s true the old team disbanded, but you can’t censor an ] that continued allocating funds for the project to developers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ytrezq (talkcontribs)
Misplaced Pages requires sourcing, you will not be able to change the article until reliable sources (such as mainstream news outlets, not crypto blogs) take notice of these changes. Also see WP:COI, if you are involved with this 'group' you should not be editing the article yourself. - MrOllie (talk) 20:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)