| Revision as of 08:35, 18 March 2007 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 1 thread(s) older than 3d to User talk:Glen/Archive14.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:04, 18 March 2007 edit undoFahrenheit451 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,109 edits →SocksNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| ::Like I said I don't really care anymore (to put it mildly), I've been working on other more important articles that I have more interest in (like ], whose grueling FAC swelled to 134 kb before it was re-set). I'd like to get the socks off my talk page basically and don't really care that much about either article. ] 19:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | ::Like I said I don't really care anymore (to put it mildly), I've been working on other more important articles that I have more interest in (like ], whose grueling FAC swelled to 134 kb before it was re-set). I'd like to get the socks off my talk page basically and don't really care that much about either article. ] 19:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Just delete their comments then and ignore any further ]. That's probably the best advice I can give you. At least he's not wasting time by going through your edit history and vandalizing all the articles you've worked on like they do with me every few weeks. If you need my help for anything, let me know. Cheers. ] 20:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | :Just delete their comments then and ignore any further ]. That's probably the best advice I can give you. At least he's not wasting time by going through your edit history and vandalizing all the articles you've worked on like they do with me every few weeks. If you need my help for anything, let me know. Cheers. ] 20:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Glen, could you please do a sock check on ]. He proposed an AfD claiming it was OR when it clearly was not and has no user page. | |||
| HIs discussion page only has a welcome message and one message left by another user.--] 20:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:04, 18 March 2007
OK Glen, I'm Finished Posting On Sid's Page
This has been more trouble than I wanted, and I have no desire for this to continue. Rcarey1979
motion capture
I have resisted re-listing our company information on the motion capture web pages. Could someone less biased than I am please police it. Several companies are now listing themselves including the one that first challenged me. I lose either way. I'm banned, and they aren't, and I look / am vindictive. Tmcsheery 06:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Socks
I'd like to report a couple of socks to you, but first a little back story. I started Designer Whey Protein and Biological Value a while ago. As you know, because you blocked him, there was a sockpuppeteer operating there. A sock came complaining on my talk page about the Biological Value article, I went out of my way to notify a ton of science experts to work on the article (over 50 which took a while becuase I didn't know where to find them), not knowing he was a sock. Anyway Yankees identified him as a sock and tagged him, so I moved on and started the Michael Jordan FAC which I've been planning for months. I decided I'd try to get back to the article, get the tags off of it, and see if I can get an expert to work on it later.
However today Designer was tagged for deletion and as spam by a new account and an anon, who have admitted they are the same account. I argued it shouldn't be deleted as it has 106,000 google hits and there are surely non-notable indepent sources which could be used to verify it's existence. I tried to provide some but they were admittedly weak and it will probably get deleted. I've been extremely busy with the Michael Jordan FAC, so I'm not going to argue for it anymore (Although Bill Phillips mentions it in his Supplement review and I'm sure there are of articles in bodybuilding mags talking about it, as it was the first brand of Whey protein to hit the market and be successful). This isn't about the afd as I'm sure it will get deleted and I don't really care about it anymore. However, all of a sudden this was left on my talk page: and I'm not sure what to do. I'm telling you all this instead of reporting on the official page as you are already familiar with it, I notified the other two admins who blocked socks of the original sockpuppet. Bssically my interest in those two articles in reaching negative integers and would like to be left alone by all these socks and single purpose accounts. Thanks in advance. Quadzilla99 18:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've been watching this as well, though I believe that ProteinMax (talk · contribs) is in fact Messenger2010 (talk · contribs). I don't think the other user (Quartet) or the IP 74.13 is also a sockpuppet of Messenger2010. Messenger2010's IP socks all started with 63.17, and this abusive puppeteer and all his socks were all very pro whey protein, to the point of fabricating material in order to have certain POV edits inserted supporting whey - so it wouldn't make sense for him to attempt to start deleting whey protein-related articles. The 74.13 IP has also edited TrimSpa (I have that one on my watch list) and made some decent edits - something Messenger2010 and his socks do not normally do.
- By the way I voted to delete the Designer Whey article (sorry) - I think the material should be moved into a newly created NEXT Proteins article instead of having it's own article. Even though I put much effort and time into the article, I have to admit it's pretty much advertising. It does not have notability like say Hydroxycut or Met-Rx that would warrant giving it it's own article - at least not in my opinion. Yankees76 19:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Like I said I don't really care anymore (to put it mildly), I've been working on other more important articles that I have more interest in (like Michael Jordan, whose grueling FAC swelled to 134 kb before it was re-set). I'd like to get the socks off my talk page basically and don't really care that much about either article. Quadzilla99 19:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Just delete their comments then and ignore any further baiting. That's probably the best advice I can give you. At least he's not wasting time by going through your edit history and vandalizing all the articles you've worked on like they do with me every few weeks. If you need my help for anything, let me know. Cheers. Yankees76 20:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Glen, could you please do a sock check on User:Yellowbeard. He proposed an AfD claiming it was OR when it clearly was not and has no user page. HIs discussion page only has a welcome message and one message left by another user.--Fahrenheit451 20:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)