| Revision as of 01:31, 29 March 2005 editYeu Ninje (talk | contribs)4,437 edits Type I PRIMA← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:34, 29 March 2005 edit undoYeu Ninje (talk | contribs)4,437 edits Type II PRIMANext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| == Type II PRIMA == | == Type II PRIMA == | ||
| In the ], a different PRIMA solution has been adopted. Under Art 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the applicable law is not determined by reference to the location of the asset. Instead, parties to the relevant account agreement are able to choose the applicable law. This solution, no longer linked to the ''lex rei sitae'', is still a PRIMA solution as its focus is at the level of the relevant intermediary. | |||
Revision as of 01:34, 29 March 2005
The Place of the Relevant Intermediary Approach, or PRIMA, is a legal principle taken in finance to determine the applicable law in relation to a security. It is an alternative approach to the historically important look-through approach, and forms the basis for the Hague Securities Convention.
Unlike the look-through approach, PRIMA does not look through the various tiers of intermediaries to the underlying securities. Rather, it stops at the level of the intermediary immediately above the parties to the pledge or transfer. Its important advantage is that the question of whether or not the applicalb e law is governed by one single jurisdiction even where a portfolio of securities of issuers is involved. This provides certainty and clarity for all parties involved.
Type I PRIMA
The so-called Type I PRIMA dates back to the late 1960s, in Belgium. Under Belgian law, the interest in respect of the underlying securities held by an investor and recorded on the books of its intermediary is treated as a different asset from the underlying securities. Thus the Belgian approach is an application of PRIMA, as well as being linked to the lex rei sitae tradition.
Such an approach causes problems in some legal systems, notable of which are those of Japan and Germany. Under both their systems, an investor would be treated as the direct owner of the underlying securities even though the security is held through tiers of intermediaries. The direct ownership in the underlying securities makes it difficult to argue that the location of the asset is at the level of an intermediary.
Type II PRIMA
In the United States, a different PRIMA solution has been adopted. Under Art 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the applicable law is not determined by reference to the location of the asset. Instead, parties to the relevant account agreement are able to choose the applicable law. This solution, no longer linked to the lex rei sitae, is still a PRIMA solution as its focus is at the level of the relevant intermediary.