| Revision as of 21:56, 16 July 2023 editYamla (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators148,019 edits →Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: Suggest declineTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:37, 17 July 2023 edit undoAman.kumar.goel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers11,806 edits →Comments by other usersTag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| ====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== | ====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== | ||
| :<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | :<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | ||
| :{{ping|Yamla}} CU has say over clerk according to SPI's hierarchy. You don't need approval of a clerk and you can run CU even without the request from any user as long as the use falls under the global CU policy. ''']''' <sup>('']'')</sup> 02:37, 17 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | ||
Revision as of 02:37, 17 July 2023
Invisibelibrarian
Invisibelibrarian (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Invisibelibrarian/Archive.
16 July 2023
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Salivahana (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Same topic area, in and around N. Chandrababu Naidu article. The sock master was notable for bloating the article and make it look like a humongous resume in the Dec 2019 - Apr 2020 period . THe suspected sock seems to be doing the same . Interaction . Requesting CU. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- @Yamla: CU has say over clerk according to SPI's hierarchy. You don't need approval of a clerk and you can run CU even without the request from any user as long as the use falls under the global CU policy. Aman Kumar Goel 02:37, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- I am a checkuser, not a clerk. This case is currently awaiting a clerk to endorse or decline the request. As an opinion only, I suggest the data is likely stale so there's probably nothing a checkuser can do. That is, I think this could be declined. We do sometimes strike it lucky with the logs, though. --Yamla (talk) 21:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Categories: