Revision as of 16:02, 9 December 2023 editBhdshoes2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,826 edits →Lawsuit: new sectionTag: New topic | Revision as of 16:09, 9 December 2023 edit undoBhdshoes2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,826 edits →Lawsuit: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hi all - i know this lawsuit is inflammatory to some but this is a hugely important legal ruling in the state of California as an employment law matter. ] (]) 16:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC) | Hi all - i know this lawsuit is inflammatory to some but this is a hugely important legal ruling in the state of California as an employment law matter. ] (]) 16:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
:Also this ruling is discussed on a zillion different pages about jackson - the page about his 05 acquittal, the page about the dance career of the plaintiffs, the page about the 2019 Leaving Neverland documentary, the page about the 1993 case. This particular ruling and cases needs its own page. Tagging my fellow Wikipedian ] as I know he is an expert on Misplaced Pages guidelines ] (]) 16:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:09, 9 December 2023
Lawsuit
Hi all - i know this lawsuit is inflammatory to some but this is a hugely important legal ruling in the state of California as an employment law matter. Bhdshoes2 (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Also this ruling is discussed on a zillion different pages about jackson - the page about his 05 acquittal, the page about the dance career of the plaintiffs, the page about the 2019 Leaving Neverland documentary, the page about the 1993 case. This particular ruling and cases needs its own page. Tagging my fellow Wikipedian user:alansohn as I know he is an expert on Misplaced Pages guidelines Bhdshoes2 (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)