Misplaced Pages

Talk:Safechuck v. MJJ Productions: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:09, 9 December 2023 editBhdshoes2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,826 edits Lawsuit: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 00:56, 14 December 2023 edit undoBhdshoes2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,826 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
Hi all - i know this lawsuit is inflammatory to some but this is a hugely important legal ruling in the state of California as an employment law matter. ] (]) 16:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC) Hi all - i know this lawsuit is inflammatory to some but this is a hugely important legal ruling in the state of California as an employment law matter. ] (]) 16:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)


:Also this ruling is discussed on a zillion different pages about jackson - the page about his 05 acquittal, the page about the dance career of the plaintiffs, the page about the 2019 Leaving Neverland documentary, the page about the 1993 case. This particular ruling and cases needs its own page. Tagging my fellow Wikipedian ] as I know he is an expert on Misplaced Pages guidelines ] (]) 16:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC) :Also this ruling is discussed on a zillion different pages about jackson - the page about his 05 acquittal, the page about the dance career of the plaintiffs, the page about the 2019 Leaving Neverland documentary, the page about the 1993 case. This particular ruling and cases needs its own page. Tagging my fellow Wikipedian as I know he is an expert on Misplaced Pages guidelines ] (]) 16:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
* removing the name of the guy I tagged because instead of actually attempting to engage in good faith, a User tried to get me sanctioned!

Revision as of 00:56, 14 December 2023

Lawsuit

Hi all - i know this lawsuit is inflammatory to some but this is a hugely important legal ruling in the state of California as an employment law matter. Bhdshoes2 (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Also this ruling is discussed on a zillion different pages about jackson - the page about his 05 acquittal, the page about the dance career of the plaintiffs, the page about the 2019 Leaving Neverland documentary, the page about the 1993 case. This particular ruling and cases needs its own page. Tagging my fellow Wikipedian as I know he is an expert on Misplaced Pages guidelines Bhdshoes2 (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
  • removing the name of the guy I tagged because instead of actually attempting to engage in good faith, a User tried to get me sanctioned!