Talk:Quantum mysticism: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 07:50, 4 January 2024 edit68.189.26.22 (talk) →Weird phrasing and sources ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:52, 4 January 2024 edit undoSineBot (talk \| contribs)Bots2,555,858 editsm Signing comment by 68.189.26.22 - "→Weird phrasing and sources: "Next edit →
Line 36:		Line 36:
	:Totally agree, this is a poor article. I'm not a physicist but have an interest in the subject, and agree that while it does tend to attract fringe ideas it is still a legitimate subject area and one with philosophical interest. ] (]) 21:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)		:Totally agree, this is a poor article. I'm not a physicist but have an interest in the subject, and agree that while it does tend to attract fringe ideas it is still a legitimate subject area and one with philosophical interest. ] (]) 21:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

	Agreed with what the two above me have said, I have seen this article a few times, and each time it seems to have gotten worse. This is a legitimate topic of philosophical debate over what effect quantum mechanics has over the mind. It seems to be too one sided, and does not acknowledge that there are people with legitimate arguments on both sides. There are people like Henry Stapp and Fred Alan Wolf whose opinions on the topic are largely glossed over.		Agreed with what the two above me have said, I have seen this article a few times, and each time it seems to have gotten worse. This is a legitimate topic of philosophical debate over what effect quantum mechanics has over the mind. It seems to be too one sided, and does not acknowledge that there are people with legitimate arguments on both sides. There are people like Henry Stapp and Fred Alan Wolf whose opinions on the topic are largely glossed over. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 07:52, 4 January 2024

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Consciousness causes collapse was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 February 2008 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Quantum mysticism on 9 July 2008. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Philosophy: Logic / Religion / Eastern Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic
	Philosophy of religion
	Eastern philosophy

The contents of the Consciousness causes collapse page were merged into Quantum mysticism. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Stephen Harrison (20 October 2022). "How Quantum Theories Took Over TikTok". Slate (magazine). Its article on "Quantum mysticism" explains that nonbelievers with expert knowledge consider it a "pseudoscience" and also references some pejorative terms such as "quantum quackery" and "quantum woo." That's because respectable scientific journals—the kind of sources that are required for Misplaced Pages's science articles—have not embraced these fringe interpretations.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

Weird phrasing and sources

A lot of this page feels like it poorly conforms to Misplaced Pages's general style and flow: clunky language, quotes strangely embedded in lines (generally a failure to paraphrase sources), etc. I'm thinking I may redo much of this page. Kedra Bhaonne (talk) 02:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Totally agree, this is a poor article. I'm not a physicist but have an interest in the subject, and agree that while it does tend to attract fringe ideas it is still a legitimate subject area and one with philosophical interest. Jeeprs (talk) 21:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Agreed with what the two above me have said, I have seen this article a few times, and each time it seems to have gotten worse. This is a legitimate topic of philosophical debate over what effect quantum mechanics has over the mind. It seems to be too one sided, and does not acknowledge that there are people with legitimate arguments on both sides. There are people like Henry Stapp and Fred Alan Wolf whose opinions on the topic are largely glossed over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.189.26.22 (talk) 07:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Categories: