| Revision as of 18:31, 5 April 2007 editA. B. (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers51,783 edits John T. Reed← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:51, 7 April 2007 edit undoRiskAficionado (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,061 edits recent behaviour of incivilityNext edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| A singularly unpleasant and disappointing experience. I never expected to have my edits characterized as spam. I think I need to take a break for a while. --] ] 18:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC) | A singularly unpleasant and disappointing experience. I never expected to have my edits characterized as spam. I think I need to take a break for a while. --] ] 18:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == recent behaviour of incivility == | |||
| BozMo, i have been experiencing difficulty with {{User|Matt57}} who has seen it fit to harrass me by interrogating me on my talk page and issuing forceful threats of blocking. Matt has posted an aggressive and uncivil blocking threat on my talk page, and edit warred to retain it when i removed it (see the recent history of my talk page). the reason for this "warning" was my reversion of contributions initially made by a block-evading sockpuppet, which Matt57 then reverted to restore. i undid these reversions, citing that the edits of block-evaders should not be supported, but also stated that i would not revert further. he then ], and then saw it fit to launch an aggressive campaign on my talk page, irrespective of the fact that he had misrepresented the admin in question (see ]). it seems that such brusque and uncollaborative behaviour, as well as the tendency to shoot from the hip in bad faith, derives from a desire to show an "iron hand" to "them". other examples of what amounts to ], previously trolling on my talk page ] ] and ]. he has also taken bad faith pot-shots in discussions i'm not even involved in, and tends to address other users with whom he disputes with in a similar manner. . i consult you as a) you have been able to intervene in similar disputes previously, and; b) i would like to see an end to this disruptive behaviour. ] 23:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:51, 7 April 2007
Please put messages for me here! I am rather tidy so I will delete once received unless there is a reason not to (such as interest to others)--BozMo 10:30, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Message:
Hi, thanks for the note about my recent edits. I was unsure about the ruling on spam, but sure that the links were good. I will now request inclusion as recommended. -- Iru-dcaf
Comments on 2006 Misplaced Pages CD Selection, the 2007 Misplaced Pages CD Selection the charity I work for SOS Children's Villages UK my personal site: Cates, my book: letter to Peter, my religion.
I will visit here most days but have a busy job and young kids so not always. My other email is my christian name @ my homepage.
Barnstar
Spamstar of Glory
|
The Spamstar of Glory | |
| Presented to BozMo for diligence in fighting spam on Misplaced Pages |
This is overdue -- I meant to do this several weeks ago. Thanks for all your work and support. --A. B. 16:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
BLP
Yeah he is. He tries to separate being an "editor" and being an "admin" but he is aggressive at times. --Woohookitty 11:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
"Data withholding" is a common term
My substantive response is on my Talk page. Try googling "data withholding" or "data sharing" some time. RonCram 11:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reasonable response. Check my Talk page for my comment.RonCram 12:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
-- Global Market Insite --
BozMo,
This page was up on Monday < http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=GMI_%28Global_Market_Insite%2C_Inc.%29&action=edit >, and disappeared yesterday. There is no discussion why? Do you have any idea what happened to it? Or why it no longer exists? Thank you for any insight!
Irishlaw 14:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- No clue what happened, I'll try and find the deletion log entry. --BozMo talk 14:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
BozMo,
Thanks for restoring. When I did not find it in the deletion logs I was curious what happened to it. Have a good day.
Irishlaw 16:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Noticed you passing through Hubbert Peak Theory. Look forward to more of the same, if you're so inclined. --Skyemoor 15:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
John T. Reed
A singularly unpleasant and disappointing experience. I never expected to have my edits characterized as spam. I think I need to take a break for a while. --A. B. 18:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
recent behaviour of incivility
BozMo, i have been experiencing difficulty with Matt57 (talk · contribs) who has seen it fit to harrass me by interrogating me on my talk page and issuing forceful threats of blocking. Matt has posted an aggressive and uncivil blocking threat on my talk page, and edit warred to retain it when i removed it (see the recent history of my talk page). the reason for this "warning" was my reversion of contributions initially made by a block-evading sockpuppet, which Matt57 then reverted to restore. i undid these reversions, citing that the edits of block-evaders should not be supported, but also stated that i would not revert further. he then consulted an admin, and then saw it fit to launch an aggressive campaign on my talk page, irrespective of the fact that he had misrepresented the admin in question (see this). it seems that such brusque and uncollaborative behaviour, as well as the tendency to shoot from the hip in bad faith, derives from a desire to show an "iron hand" to "them". other examples of what amounts to harrassment, previously trolling on my talk page here here and here. he has also taken bad faith pot-shots in discussions i'm not even involved in, and tends to address other users with whom he disputes with in a similar manner. . i consult you as a) you have been able to intervene in similar disputes previously, and; b) i would like to see an end to this disruptive behaviour. ITAQALLAH 23:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)