| Revision as of 18:23, 19 February 2024 editNihonjoe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Template editors124,582 edits →Aquaveo: explanation← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:11, 19 February 2024 edit undoKashmiri (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users43,540 edits →Aquaveo: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Comment''': I don't know about the creator of the article, or any of the other contributors, but I haven't ever been paid to work on the article. It's just found within one of many topics I find interesting (I've edited a fair number of river and lake articles over the years, and Aquaveo's software is used by a lot of people writing academic papers analyzing rivers and lakes). All of my contributions have been working to improve the article by adding references, removing marketing speak, and expanding it based on references I found (pretty much what I do for every other article I work on). As it stands right now, it's pretty much on the border of notability, and it could go either way. The ''Deseret News'' article is definitely a solid source. As the nom noted, most of the others are more informational references that (taken together) might push it over into notability, but also may not. So, I could go either way. If it is decided to delete the article, I'd request it be userfied so I can work on it. ···] · <small>] · ] · ]!</small> 16:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC) | *'''Comment''': I don't know about the creator of the article, or any of the other contributors, but I haven't ever been paid to work on the article. It's just found within one of many topics I find interesting (I've edited a fair number of river and lake articles over the years, and Aquaveo's software is used by a lot of people writing academic papers analyzing rivers and lakes). All of my contributions have been working to improve the article by adding references, removing marketing speak, and expanding it based on references I found (pretty much what I do for every other article I work on). As it stands right now, it's pretty much on the border of notability, and it could go either way. The ''Deseret News'' article is definitely a solid source. As the nom noted, most of the others are more informational references that (taken together) might push it over into notability, but also may not. So, I could go either way. If it is decided to delete the article, I'd request it be userfied so I can work on it. ···] · <small>] · ] · ]!</small> 16:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
| *:I should also note that being small, privately-held, in Utah, and producing niche software do not, in and of themselves, disqualify any company per ]. Those attributes are irrelevant to notability. As my previous comment noted, the ''only'' thing relevant is whether the company has been given significant coverage in multiple, third-party (independent) ]. The ''Deseret News'' article is one such source. None of the others used in the article are likely helpful there. So, at least one additional such source would likely need to be found. ···] · <small>] · ] · ]!</small> 18:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC) | *:I should also note that being small, privately-held, in Utah, and producing niche software do not, in and of themselves, disqualify any company per ]. Those attributes are irrelevant to notability. As my previous comment noted, the ''only'' thing relevant is whether the company has been given significant coverage in multiple, third-party (independent) ]. The ''Deseret News'' article is one such source. None of the others used in the article are likely helpful there. So, at least one additional such source would likely need to be found. ···] · <small>] · ] · ]!</small> 18:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
| *::It has to be asked whether ''Deseret'', a single reference from 2016, is a sufficient evidence of ] notability; especially that it... does not mention Aquaveo. I guess the argument will go that it's insufficient. Please note that this is an article about a company and its notability per ], not about any of its products which may or may not be notable per ]. — ] ] 19:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:11, 19 February 2024
Aquaveo
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Aquaveo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCOMPANY – a small, privately held company (LLC), occupying a small office somewhere in Utah, US and producing niche software. Article only includes affiliated references or ones that don't even mention the company's name, proving perhaps that the company exists but falling short of offering evidence of its encyclopaedic notability. Accounts of article creator and contributors have been alleged to be affiliated with the company. (Redacted) — kashmīrī 16:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Software. — kashmīrī 16:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Utah. Skynxnex (talk) 17:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't know about the creator of the article, or any of the other contributors, but I haven't ever been paid to work on the article. It's just found within one of many topics I find interesting (I've edited a fair number of river and lake articles over the years, and Aquaveo's software is used by a lot of people writing academic papers analyzing rivers and lakes). All of my contributions have been working to improve the article by adding references, removing marketing speak, and expanding it based on references I found (pretty much what I do for every other article I work on). As it stands right now, it's pretty much on the border of notability, and it could go either way. The Deseret News article is definitely a solid source. As the nom noted, most of the others are more informational references that (taken together) might push it over into notability, but also may not. So, I could go either way. If it is decided to delete the article, I'd request it be userfied so I can work on it. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- I should also note that being small, privately-held, in Utah, and producing niche software do not, in and of themselves, disqualify any company per WP:COMPANY. Those attributes are irrelevant to notability. As my previous comment noted, the only thing relevant is whether the company has been given significant coverage in multiple, third-party (independent) secondary sources. The Deseret News article is one such source. None of the others used in the article are likely helpful there. So, at least one additional such source would likely need to be found. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- It has to be asked whether Deseret, a single reference from 2016, is a sufficient evidence of WP:LASTING notability; especially that it... does not mention Aquaveo. I guess the argument will go that it's insufficient. Please note that this is an article about a company and its notability per WP:NCOMPANY, not about any of its products which may or may not be notable per WP:NSOFTWARE. — kashmīrī 19:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- I should also note that being small, privately-held, in Utah, and producing niche software do not, in and of themselves, disqualify any company per WP:COMPANY. Those attributes are irrelevant to notability. As my previous comment noted, the only thing relevant is whether the company has been given significant coverage in multiple, third-party (independent) secondary sources. The Deseret News article is one such source. None of the others used in the article are likely helpful there. So, at least one additional such source would likely need to be found. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)