Misplaced Pages

:Featured article candidates/Ronald Reagan/archive4: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates | Ronald Reagan Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:11, 8 April 2007 editĐộclậpTudoHạnhphúc (talk | contribs)33 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 02:12, 8 April 2007 edit undoĐộclậpTudoHạnhphúc (talk | contribs)33 edits []Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
===]=== ===]===
]. No treatment of his stance on the ]. No family picture showing any of his children. No picture showing his ] appearance, 'Time for Choosing' speech, war film propaganda activities, military service, ], or more-acclaimed film performances (], ]). Otherwise brilliant. Only question for me is whether there is full compliance to WP style and referencing standards - which I've not looked into. There's a couple of 'citation needed' tags.] 02:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC) ].<br />No treatment of his stance on the ]. No family picture showing any of his children. No picture showing his ] appearance, 'Time for Choosing' speech, war film propaganda activities, military service, ], or more-acclaimed film performances (], ]). Otherwise brilliant. Only question for me is whether there is full compliance to WP style and referencing standards - which I've not looked into. There's a couple of 'citation needed' tags.] 02:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)


] ]

Revision as of 02:12, 8 April 2007

Ronald Reagan

'One more for The Gipper'.
No treatment of his stance on the War for the Independence of Vietnam. No family picture showing any of his children. No picture showing his HUAC appearance, 'Time for Choosing' speech, war film propaganda activities, military service, first wife, or more-acclaimed film performances (Bedtime for Bonzo, King's Row). Otherwise brilliant. Only question for me is whether there is full compliance to WP style and referencing standards - which I've not looked into. There's a couple of 'citation needed' tags.ĐộclậpTudoHạnhphúc 02:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

previous FAC