Misplaced Pages

Talk:Allegiance: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:35, 9 April 2007 editDomBot (talk | contribs)6,861 edits Use 1911 talk template to add Misplaced Pages articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica cat to talk page per WP:CFD/Log/2007 March 24 using AWB← Previous edit Revision as of 02:32, 22 June 2007 edit undo68.99.231.207 (talk) The original was offensive in its nationalismNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


The original assumed that states own those they declare as citizens, and assumed that an actual "duty" of some sort is "owed" to the state. I changed the wording in an attempt to achieve neutrality, but I think it is clumsy and welcome alternative suggestions. --] 10:28, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC) The original assumed that states own those they declare as citizens, and assumed that an actual "duty" of some sort is "owed" to the state. I changed the wording in an attempt to achieve neutrality, but I think it is clumsy and welcome alternative suggestions. --] 10:28, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I tried a new wording. ] 02:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


== ] == == ] ==

Revision as of 02:32, 22 June 2007

Template:1911 talk

The original was offensive in its nationalism

The original assumed that states own those they declare as citizens, and assumed that an actual "duty" of some sort is "owed" to the state. I changed the wording in an attempt to achieve neutrality, but I think it is clumsy and welcome alternative suggestions. --Silverback 10:28, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I tried a new wording. 68.99.231.207 02:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Link suggestions

An automated Misplaced Pages link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Allegiance article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience.
Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. To do this, just add {{User:LinkBot/suggestions/Allegiance}} to this page. — LinkBot 10:33, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Removed "some think" from the first line

It might seem offensive or nationalistic to put it the way it was put, but as rephrased it appears to un-define the word altogether.

Perhaps a paragraph about international recognition of the right to emigrate, and to renounce allegiance would make more sense, somewhere in the body of the article?


Disambiguous page

This page should really be a page to clarify exactly what the user wants to find. I came here looking for information about the Allegiance computer game...even though there is a link at the bottom of this page for the computer game I should not have seen this page at all. Flyerhell 09:36, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

The disambiguation link, though, is at the top of the page... --badpazzword 15:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)