| Revision as of 07:34, 11 April 2007 editHu12 (talk | contribs)91,877 edits →Rudeness← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:38, 11 April 2007 edit undo67.163.193.239 (talk) →RudenessNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you are doing at ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR -->--] 07:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you are doing at ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR -->--] 07:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| STOP!!!! The whole reason the admins blanked my page was to put an end to this. Please do not undo my deletions again.] 07:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:38, 11 April 2007
Rudeness
I apologize if you think I attacked you or was otherwise rude. I am just frustrated by your apparent disregarding of comments that disagree with you. You seem to think inclusion of the link has won, which is not the case. Yesterday I counted 17 opinions in some form or another.
- 10 for: 3 were either the users sole contributions or majority of, so if we disregard that 7
- 7 against: 2 of which were either the user's sole contributions or majority of, so if we disregard that 5
7 to 5 simply doesn't represent consensus. Sorry. 07:13, IvoShandor 07:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- And that's only if you wanna get hyper technical, some of those rationales were pretty weak and as such generally wouldn't be included as deciding factors in consensus. Maybe read over WP:CONSENSUS, it may help you see what to shoot for. IvoShandor 07:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Sheesh. Real nice, you removed my comment? Why? IvoShandor 07:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--Hu12 07:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
STOP!!!! The whole reason the admins blanked my page was to put an end to this. Please do not undo my deletions again.67.163.193.239 07:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)