Revision as of 21:18, 11 April 2005 editWikiEditor2004 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users51,646 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:41, 12 April 2005 edit undo70.48.101.61 (talk) →Paganija or Pagania or Narenta or NeretvaNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This was a ] principality located in today's ] near the ] River. | This was a ] principality located in today's ] near the ] River. | ||
Pagania bordered the lands of ] to the north and northeast ] to the west. | |||
] descibes the Paganians in ] as a ] tribe which settled in present ] around the ] River at the start of the 6th century. Pagania entered into confederations with the Serb princes of Raska early on. | ] descibes the Paganians in ] as a ] tribe which settled in present ] around the ] River at the start of the 6th century. Pagania entered into confederations with the Serb princes of Raska early on. |
Revision as of 16:41, 12 April 2005
Paganija or Pagania or Narenta or Neretva
This was a medieval principality located in today's Herzegovina near the Neretva River.
Pagania bordered the lands of Zahumlje to the north and northeast Croatia to the west.
Porphyrogenitus descibes the Paganians in De Administrando Imperio as a Serb tribe which settled in present Hercegovina around the Neretva River at the start of the 6th century. Pagania entered into confederations with the Serb princes of Raska early on.
Croat academics have pointed out that Pagania could have been Croat, but this is not generally accepted since these claims rely on Chronicle of the Priest of Duklja, which has been discredited as unreliable and full of errors. It is now accepted in most academic circles outside of Croatia that Travunia / Travunja Zachumlie / Zahumlje, Bosnia / Bosna and Zeta / Duklja were settled with Serb tribes, as it states in De Administrando Imperio.
This history article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |