Misplaced Pages

User talk:70.113.114.144: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:51, 13 April 2007 editBuddhipriya (talk | contribs)16,977 edits vandalism report has been filed← Previous edit Revision as of 03:52, 13 April 2007 edit undoBuddhipriya (talk | contribs)16,977 edits fix linkNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
{{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the ] you added {{{{{subst|}}}#if:The Argumentative Indian|to the page ]}} do not comply with our ]. ]; nor should it be used for ] or promotion. Since Misplaced Pages uses ] tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- Template:uw-spam1 --> Blogs are not suitable as ].] 03:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC) {{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the ] you added {{{{{subst|}}}#if:The Argumentative Indian|to the page ]}} do not comply with our ]. ]; nor should it be used for ] or promotion. Since Misplaced Pages uses ] tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- Template:uw-spam1 --> Blogs are not suitable as ].] 03:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


A report has been filed with administrators regarding the fact that you currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Argumentative Indian. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. ] 03:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC) A report has been filed with administrators regarding the fact that you currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. ] 03:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:52, 13 April 2007

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to The Argumentative Indian. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Abecedare 23:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

I have responded to your message on my talk page. Abecedare 00:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Argumentative Indian. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. Abecedare 00:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page The Argumentative Indian do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Misplaced Pages is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Misplaced Pages uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Blogs are not suitable as WP:RS.Buddhipriya 03:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

A report has been filed with administrators regarding the fact that you currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Argumentative Indian. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Buddhipriya 03:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)