Revision as of 16:18, 14 April 2007 editFlymeoutofhere (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,726 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:23, 13 August 2007 edit undoTariqabjotu (talk | contribs)Administrators36,354 edits →Copyright infringement: + replyNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Copyright infringement == | == Copyright infringement == | ||
''regarding the :'' This revert doesn't comply with the official policy on the English Misplaced Pages (]). The summary of the revert (''"revert to june 10, 2006 (07:45 ) version due to subsequent copyright violations"'') doesn't provide any reference to proof the copyright infringement. A staff member of the has been informed by email. ] 11:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC) | ''regarding the :'' This revert doesn't comply with the official policy on the English Misplaced Pages (]). The summary of the revert (''"revert to june 10, 2006 (07:45 ) version due to subsequent copyright violations"'') doesn't provide any reference to proof the copyright infringement. A staff member of the has been informed by email. ] 11:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
:The first two paragraphs were a carbon copy of from the Israel Museum. For future reference, it would be best to inform the relevant editor if you want some more information about the source of the copyright violation, especially since it's quite clear no one is looking at this article. -- ''']''' 16:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:23, 13 August 2007
Copyright infringement
regarding the revert (15:36, 27 February 2007): This revert doesn't comply with the official policy on the English Misplaced Pages (If you find a copyright infringement). The summary of the revert ("revert to june 10, 2006 (07:45 ) version due to subsequent copyright violations") doesn't provide any reference to proof the copyright infringement. A staff member of the Israel Museum has been informed by email. --ThT 11:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- The first two paragraphs were a carbon copy of this page from the Israel Museum. For future reference, it would be best to inform the relevant editor if you want some more information about the source of the copyright violation, especially since it's quite clear no one is looking at this article. -- tariqabjotu 16:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)