Misplaced Pages

User talk:Fm.illuminatus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:02, 17 April 2007 editSlrubenstein (talk | contribs)30,655 edits Evolution← Previous edit Revision as of 18:30, 17 April 2007 edit undoCrum375 (talk | contribs)Administrators23,961 edits BlockNext edit →
Line 74: Line 74:


:Your comments are trolling because it is clear that you do not understand the scientific literature and have not read the articles (including the linked article on the evidence), and you are not providing any verifiable sources to back up your claims. All evolutionary scientists who make the distinction between micro- and macro-evolution understand them to be different in scale, not in the basic mechanisms. Scientists have observed speciation occur. One example is . If you find an article published in a peer-reviewed journal by a scientist arguing that the Hawthorn fly is not an example of speciation in process, let us know about that article and we can include it. ] | ] 18:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC) :Your comments are trolling because it is clear that you do not understand the scientific literature and have not read the articles (including the linked article on the evidence), and you are not providing any verifiable sources to back up your claims. All evolutionary scientists who make the distinction between micro- and macro-evolution understand them to be different in scale, not in the basic mechanisms. Scientists have observed speciation occur. One example is . If you find an article published in a peer-reviewed journal by a scientist arguing that the Hawthorn fly is not an example of speciation in process, let us know about that article and we can include it. ] | ] 18:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

== Block ==

You have been reported for 3RR violation on ] and I have blocked you for 24 hours. Please take the time to carefully read our ] policy. I hope you come back to contribute in a collaborative manner. Thanks, ] 18:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:30, 17 April 2007

Welcome!

Hello Fm.illuminatus! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! +A.0u 00:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Evolution

Regarding evolution, please study WP:NPOV carefully, with particular reference to WP:Undue weight and to the details given in Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/FAQ under the headings of Giving "equal validity" and Pseudoscience. If you have fully referenced information you want to have added, bring it up on the talk page with evidence that it complies with WP:A. ... Aggressive denunciations of science can only be regarded as trolling. .. dave souza, talk 10:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Evolution. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you.Orangemarlin 17:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Your comments are trolling because it is clear that you do not understand the scientific literature and have not read the articles (including the linked article on the evidence), and you are not providing any verifiable sources to back up your claims. All evolutionary scientists who make the distinction between micro- and macro-evolution understand them to be different in scale, not in the basic mechanisms. Scientists have observed speciation occur. One example is . If you find an article published in a peer-reviewed journal by a scientist arguing that the Hawthorn fly is not an example of speciation in process, let us know about that article and we can include it. Slrubenstein | Talk 18:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Block

You have been reported for 3RR violation on Evolution and I have blocked you for 24 hours. Please take the time to carefully read our WP:3RR policy. I hope you come back to contribute in a collaborative manner. Thanks, Crum375 18:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)