| Revision as of 16:16, 8 August 2024 view sourceLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,305,409 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Eric Corbett/Archives/2024/July, User talk:Eric Corbett/Archives/2024/June) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:10, 8 September 2024 view source Gerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers382,188 edits →TFA: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 249: | Line 249: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{-}} | {{-}} | ||
| == TFA == | |||
| {{User QAIbox | |||
| | image = Sunflower against sky, Ehrenbach.jpg | |||
| | image_upright = 0.8 | |||
| | bold = ] · ] · ] | |||
| }} | |||
| Thank you today for your share in ], introduced (in 2010) by your conom: "I am nominating this for featured article because... it's not a bishop! Or a horse! Actually, it's horse related. Although one of the more obscure episodes in Thoroughbred history, it details an attempt by the English Thoroughbred breeding establishment to ensure the "purity" of their breed. However, it never really worked as they intended, and eventually was repealed. Although it's popularly known as an "Act" it was never actually legislation, just a rule for the registration of horses, not enforced by any governmental authority. It's been copyedited by Malleus, who also graciously helped with the English research on the subject. Photos should be good, as I took one and the other is from 1857! Malleus should be considered a co-nom."! - I miss you. -- ] (]) 07:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:10, 8 September 2024
 |
| 2007 archive |
| 2008 archive |
| 2009 archive |
| 2010 archive |
| 2011 archive |
| 2012 archive |
| 2013 archive |
| 2014 archive |
| 2015 archive |
| 2016 archive |
| 2017 archive |
| 2018 archive |
| 2019 archive |
TFA
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Thank you today for your share in Jersey Act, introduced (in 2010) by your conom: "I am nominating this for featured article because... it's not a bishop! Or a horse! Actually, it's horse related. Although one of the more obscure episodes in Thoroughbred history, it details an attempt by the English Thoroughbred breeding establishment to ensure the "purity" of their breed. However, it never really worked as they intended, and eventually was repealed. Although it's popularly known as an "Act" it was never actually legislation, just a rule for the registration of horses, not enforced by any governmental authority. It's been copyedited by Malleus, who also graciously helped with the English research on the subject. Photos should be good, as I took one and the other is from 1857! Malleus should be considered a co-nom."! - I miss you. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)