Misplaced Pages

User talk:Sitush: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:26, 23 October 2024 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,118 edits Invitation to participate in a research: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery← Previous edit Revision as of 17:41, 30 October 2024 edit undoDreamRimmer bot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Extended confirmed users17,027 editsm Fix mass message error per WP:AWBREQTag: paws [2.2]Next edit →
Line 56: Line 56:
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.


The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .


Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Revision as of 17:41, 30 October 2024

An editor thinks something might be wrong with this page. They can't be arsed to fix it, but can rest assured that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag.
Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly what the tagging editor was worked up about.


Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33



This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

... or panic madly and freak out?
Have you come here to rant at me? It is water off a duck's back.
Manspreading

Caste promotion account

Hello, please look at this user he is editing majority particular caste related articles and is heavily using doubtful references. He is Rajput promoting account only. Check his contributions.

War article without any authentic source

Please once see this Battle of Mandan page. Not a single source looks credible. 2 out of 3 the sources are even low rated on Google books and one is by a caste historian.

References

1) Hooja, Rima (2006). A History of Rajasthan. Rupa and company.

2) Sinh, Ranbir (2001). History of Shekhawats. p. 280.

3) Meharda, B.L. Territory, Polity, and Status- A Study of Shekhawats.

Here 1st source is from some Rupa company, other 2 are from caste writers not credible historians.

This whole article is a propoganda against reality. Please User:Sitush check it.

Question about WP:RAJ.

Hello, I hope you don’t mind me leaving a question here if that’s all right. I wanted to ask something that you’ve probably answered in the past but unfortunately, I couldn’t find anything in my search. Does User:Sitush/CasteSources apply to all raj sources in general or is it specific to citations about the caste system during that era? I’ve seen conflicting opinions on this. I’ve read that Jadunath Sarkar is generally considered outdated for example, although he was a military historiographer. That made me assume that all sources from the raj era are generally considered outdated, not just ones focused on the caste system. But I can’t be too sure, so I wanted to ask. @Sitush Someguywhosbored (talk) 05:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your kindness

Many years back. God bless. 2409:4085:D10:541B:B9BA:E2D2:9898:81E (talk) 11:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages needs you

It's been a long time. I hope you're doing well. If you get free time, make cleanups in South Asian groups articles. Misplaced Pages misses you! Kautilyapundit (talk) 11:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)