Revision as of 06:15, 1 November 2024 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,132 editsm Signing comment by 24.128.59.115 - ""← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 15:11, 31 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,304,867 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:State-sponsored terrorism/Archive 2) (bot |
Line 66: |
Line 66: |
|
|archive = Talk:State-sponsored terrorism/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:State-sponsored terrorism/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== Questionable opinion pieces about the US as a state sponsor of terror == |
|
|
|
|
|
This quote is very subjective and opinionated, probably written by people with a bias against the US. |
|
|
|
|
|
"The U.S. Government, which has repeatedly engaged in sponsorship of terrorism as a feature of its foreign policy," |
|
|
|
|
|
If you actually read the sources, they say things like "the US supported the South African apartheid government". While supporting the apartheid government was morally questionable at best, its completely illogical to say that the government itself was a terrorist force. Just because a government is immoral doesn't mean its synonymous with terrorism. Calling it a feature of foreign policy is even more absurd. This is like calling the US a state sponsor of terror because it does trade with China which has subjugated the Tibetans and Uyghur Muslims. |
|
|
|
|
|
You can certainly criticize US foreign policy mistakes in droves, but it's an entirely different statement to claim that US used terrorism as a feature. The author, Edward S. Herman, is incredibly biased and has an axe to grind. The source is trash basically. Supporting a government you don't like isn't terrorism. A country that supports Iran for example wouldn't itself be a state sponsor of terror even though Iran is. It's not like a communicable disease. |
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.jstor.org/stable/29766326 <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 06:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Citation issue in "India" section == |
|
== Citation issue in "India" section == |
Line 87: |
Line 74: |
|
|
|
|
|
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/chinese-agencies-helping-north-east-militants-in-myanmar-4468384/ |
|
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/chinese-agencies-helping-north-east-militants-in-myanmar-4468384/ |
|
|
|
|
==Right Wing Indian politicians and their role with state sponser terror== |
|
|
Many Indian riots was program by State to target and kill people from a community. We may include that also in India section. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 18:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
Section claims Sri Lanka has accused India of sponsoring terrorism but the linked citation shows exactly the opposite; an errant minister redacting his statement