Misplaced Pages

Carol Dweck: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:52, 24 April 2007 editSkysmith (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers71,266 edits ?← Previous edit Revision as of 10:53, 28 April 2007 edit undoSmackBot (talk | contribs)3,734,324 editsm Date/fix the maintenance tags or gen fixesNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Importance|date=April 2007}}
{{importance}}


Carol Dweck is a professor at ] and a ]. Carol Dweck is a professor at ] and a ].

Revision as of 10:53, 28 April 2007

 ??? 

Carol Dweck is a professor at Stanford University and a social psychologist.

Her key contribution to social psychology relates to implicit theories of intelligence. According to Dweck, individuals can be placed on a continuum according to their implicit views of where (intellectual) success comes from. Some believe their success is based on innate ability; these are said to have a "fixed" implicit theory of intelligence. Others, who believe their success is based on hard work and learning, are said to have a "growth" or an "incremental" theory of intelligence. (It is not necessarily the case that individuals will be able to state clearly their own beliefs on the subject, but they can be discerned from answers to simple survey questions, such as "Do you think it is more likely that a student would do well on a test because they are smart, or because they studied hard?")

This is important because (1) individuals with a "growth" theory are more likely to continue despite setbacks and attempt to develop their skill sets even when met with initial failure, and (2) individuals' theories of intelligence can be affected by subtle environmental cues. For example, children given praise such as "good job, you're very smart" are much more likely to develop an innate theory, whereas if given compliments like "good job, you worked very hard" they are likely to develop a growth theory. In other words, it is possible to encourage students, for example, to persist despite failure by encouraging them to think about learning in a certain way.

Sources

This article has not been added to any content categories. Please help out by adding categories to it so that it can be listed with similar articles. (April 2007)
Category: