Misplaced Pages

User talk:Kirbytime: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:01, 25 April 2007 editKirbytime (talk | contribs)2,961 edits stop edit warring on my talk page← Previous edit Revision as of 17:33, 27 April 2007 edit undoMatt57 (talk | contribs)8,665 edits 72 virginsNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:


Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at ], at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Misplaced Pages, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at ], in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at ] - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! ]...''<small><font color="#008822">]</font></small>'' 10:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC) Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at ], at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Misplaced Pages, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at ], in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at ] - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! ]...''<small><font color="#008822">]</font></small>'' 10:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

== ] ==

This is not POV. Its based on article. Your edit was thus invalid. --] <sup>(]•])</sup> 17:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:33, 27 April 2007

I always respond to messages here.


Archive

Chronological Archives


1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18


Topical Archives


munafiqun

{{Afghanistan-newspaper-stub}}

Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at Misplaced Pages:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Misplaced Pages, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 10:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

72 virgins

This is not POV. Its based on article. Your edit here was thus invalid. --Matt57 17:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC)