Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1258243594 -->
== Please see ] ==
== Please see ] ==
Revision as of 20:07, 5 December 2024
This is M.Bitton's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Hi, because of lack of time, i was not able to complete the article yesterday, thank you very much for taking the time to explain me how to use the Harv style and for completing (and correcting my mistakes) my edits at Medo-Babylonian conquest of the Assyrian Empire. Cheers. ---Wikaviani 21:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
I see that you check recent edits for appropriateness. I clicked through to see a set of the reversions that you had made for rejected submissions, and I agreed with all of what I saw you had done. It seemed apparent to me through the decisions you made and the comments that you left that you were giving human attention to the decisions you made rather than over-relying on tools and automation. Thanks for that, and thanks especially for the notes you leave. You are doing good review. Blue Rasberry (talk)01:39, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
For answering a lot of edit requests and helping to keep the backlog at bay. For a while, I was taking care of that on my own, and it feels nice to see someone else get to it first every now and then! Actualcpscm (talk) 17:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
@Actualcpscm: thank you very much for the encouragement and for tackling those time consuming edit requests that tend to be pushed to the back of the queue. Keep up the great work! Best, M.Bitton (talk) 22:39, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for your incredible work on the Horn of Africa relief map :)
The Original Barnstar
Here's a barnstar for your incredible work on the Horn of Africa relief map! Really appreciate the effort you put into it :) KluskaSlaska (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Also, on a related note, I would love to do some more map work once I have more time in late summer. Do you have any good guides on how to get started on maps for Misplaced Pages? :) KluskaSlaska (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Honestly, I'm a bit disappointed in myself for not giving this to you sooner! You have been a great help creating maps for many articles, don't stop doing what you do! – Treetoes023 (talk) 22:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Due to unrelated drama I won't bore you with, I found myself looking at the history of this article, and uuh, thanks. A whole lot of POV-pushing was going on. When I have fewer tabs open I will try to remember to come back and give you a barnstar.
I agree. I suppose a disposable IP address is what they are going to use now. I will let obvious useful things through, but not the self aggrandising claptrap. I do not believe the gentleman to be straightforward. 🇺🇦 FiddleFaddle 🇺🇦 21:25, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
It's the self justifying bullshit for being wealthy, and not being a necessarily decent human being. A lot of the article history contains contemptible and referenced behaviours. Between my post and yours I said no. 🇺🇦 FiddleFaddle 🇺🇦 21:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
about reverting edit
Hi
I hope you’re doing well. I noticed that the photo I added for the Royal Mausoleum of Mauretania was reverted with (not improvement comment) , and I’m a bit confused about why. The picture I uploaded is well-framed, complete, and clearly represents the monument without any major obstructions.the one currently used is partially hidden by a tree, which doesn’t highlight the monument as effectively.
Also, it’s worth mentioning that this photo was one of the Top 10 winners in the 2020 Wiki Loves Monuments Algeria competition, so I believe it meets high standards in terms of quality and representation.
Could you explain what was considered a “negative performance” in this awesome photo? I’d really appreciate your feedback so I can better understand the decision and contribute more effectively in the future. Dezedien (talk) 17:46, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
I don't see it as an improvement (it's too dark), but you're welcome to start a discussion about it and see what the others think. M.Bitton (talk) 19:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
