| Revision as of 22:12, 30 December 2024 editZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,901 edits →Good article reassessment for Arthur Phillip: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:14, 3 January 2025 edit undoMitch Ames (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers187,705 edits →Excessive out-of-scope information and SYN on Esperance articles re traditional ownership: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Excessive out-of-scope information and SYN on Esperance articles re traditional ownership == | |||
| Editors are invited to comment at {{section link|WT:WA|Excessive out-of-scope information and SYN on Esperance articles re traditional ownership}} on the inclusion of unnecessary details and synthesis with respect to traditional ownership of the land in specific localities in the ], in WA. ] (]) 08:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:14, 3 January 2025
Noticeboard of WikiProject AustraliaShortcut Australian Wikipedians' notice board
Portal | Project | Board | Alerts | Deletions | To-Do | Category | Related | Help
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. | |
Postnominal letters and infoboxes
See Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Biography#MOS:POSTNOM for discussion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:22, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Melbourne Airport
Melbourne Airport has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:30, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Should National Socialist Network rallies be included in Mount Warning and Corowa articles?
Editors are invited to comment at Talk:Mount_Warning#historical_irrelevance and Talk:Corowa#If_the_rally_is_historically_insignificant_why_was_it_all_over_the_news_for_weeks_then? as to whether or not to include the National Socialist Network rallies in those articles. Mitch Ames (talk) 02:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry but I dont think a lack of "historical relevance" is a sound argument for or against the inclusion of events that otherwise meet the WP:GNG and are readily verifiable because of WP:CRYSTAL. We also need to be careful about WP:NPOV if we arent telling the whole story. See my comments at the Mount Warning talk page discussion. Dfadden (talk) 12:19, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for 2015 Australian Grand Prix
2015 Australian Grand Prix has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:08, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Aboriginal Community Benefit Fund/Youpla
Was rather surprised to find the Aboriginal Community Benefit Fund/Youpla scandal completely missing from Misplaced Pages, so I put together an article, please chip in and help link it where relevant. Jpatokal (talk) 04:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Arthur Phillip
Arthur Phillip has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Excessive out-of-scope information and SYN on Esperance articles re traditional ownership
Editors are invited to comment at WT:WA § Excessive out-of-scope information and SYN on Esperance articles re traditional ownership on the inclusion of unnecessary details and synthesis with respect to traditional ownership of the land in specific localities in the Shire of Esperance, in WA. Mitch Ames (talk) 08:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: