| Revision as of 20:15, 1 January 2025 editMartinevans123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers233,918 edits →December 2024: final warning for vandalism, next one's a block← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:48, 2 January 2025 edit undoTigerShark (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators17,573 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you ] Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> ] (]) 20:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you ] Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> ] (]) 20:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ==Edit warring== | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about ]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 15:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:48, 2 January 2025
December 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Bonnie and Clyde. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Bonnie and Clyde, you may be blocked from editing. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Bonnie and Clyde. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Bonnie and Clyde shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. TigerShark (talk) 15:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)