| Revision as of 19:55, 12 January 2025 edit49.195.3.58 (talk) Take criticism in stride, mor0nTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:56, 12 January 2025 edit undoBusterD (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,002 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 49.195.3.58 (talk) to last revision by FloquenbeamTags: Twinkle UndoNext edit → | ||
| Line 174: | Line 174: | ||
| ::Max ] (]) 06:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC) | ::Max ] (]) 06:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::Note that I'm not claiming you were editing in bad faith. I agree that you exhibited "good behaviour" and were clearly editing in good faith. You weren't aware of the restrictions, which is why I let you know. Specifically, check out ]. In that subject area, the "Extended confirmed restriction" applies. You are not yet an "extended confirmed" editor, meaning you are not permitted to edit in that topic area. That includes talk pages. Frankly, the standard template I left on your talk page does not do a great job of spelling this out so it's no wonder you were unaware. ] includes some additional information at the top (see "Warning: active arbitration remedies"), but I wouldn't expect people to notice that unless it was specifically brought to their attention. In summary, you need to avoid editing in that subject area until you are "extended-confirmed", which happens automatically on accounts at least 30 days old and which have made at least 500 edits. --] (]) 12:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC) | :::Note that I'm not claiming you were editing in bad faith. I agree that you exhibited "good behaviour" and were clearly editing in good faith. You weren't aware of the restrictions, which is why I let you know. Specifically, check out ]. In that subject area, the "Extended confirmed restriction" applies. You are not yet an "extended confirmed" editor, meaning you are not permitted to edit in that topic area. That includes talk pages. Frankly, the standard template I left on your talk page does not do a great job of spelling this out so it's no wonder you were unaware. ] includes some additional information at the top (see "Warning: active arbitration remedies"), but I wouldn't expect people to notice that unless it was specifically brought to their attention. In summary, you need to avoid editing in that subject area until you are "extended-confirmed", which happens automatically on accounts at least 30 days old and which have made at least 500 edits. --] (]) 12:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| == Apropos the Despicable Morons that are Cullen328, Yamla, and his Brood of Ungulates == | |||
| :::::Since it is evident that Misplaced Pages admins are inordinately petulant and driven by malice (what else explains preventing one from editing their own talk page to add remarks?), I have been compelled to circumvent impositions to pen the following observations—however trenchant—directed at the troglodytes whose highhandedness has left me acutely astonished. Consider it a coup de grâce. | |||
| :::::Directed to Yamla: are you harebrained or were you deprived of oxygen over a considerable span so as to trigger a bout of brain damage? When did I "abuse" multiple accounts? Is lying part of your repertoire? I strongly suggest you desist from making spurious allegations and not think of this "volunteering" gig you are engaged in with such high stead you forget to recollect the fact it is a sinecure oddity: you aren't the janitor, let alone the president; to be driven by such infantile speciousness is astounding. Power-tripping mör0ns of your kind seldom realise the fact that there exists a world beyond the confines of the internet, so if you are tempted to believe people will abide by the whole "sIx MoNtH" malarkey, I believe you are mistaken. But then again, whom am I kidding? Luddites of your kind seldom acquiesce to reason. | |||
| :::::It's awfully amusing how one remark against admins led to the deprivation of the ability to edit my own talk page, lol. Not remotely fond of criticism, are we? This is precisely why Misplaced Pages has attained notoriety for blatantly stifling actual consensus: the fact that the coterie of you neanderthals are so obtuse was exemplified when you refused to even bother Googling my username. LödedDiaper is a reference to a beloved children's book, numbnuts. The last I checked, it does not qualify as profane as it was not driven by an attempt to indulge in profanity or lurid indiscretions. A solitary Google search would've abundantly clarified my position, but when checkered men like Cullen328 preside over that kiddie table of theirs, there's nothing that can be done except pretend the farce exists. I've heard plenty about Cullen328—A man of ignoble reputation who has been plagued by accusations of rapacity and conflicts of interest—so I wasn't baffled in the slightest when he unilaterally blocked me. Exceptionally mature behaviour for a man whose legs are dangling in the grave, aren't they? I had a look at Cullen328's face, and, oh, dear Lord, never have I come across a face as smug and punchable as his. Reminds me of that German word Backpfeifengesicht (a punchable face). Never has a word been more apposite than this. | |||
| :::::The only core issue was my heretofore petty editorial dispute with a mor0n with an affinity to the incumbent Hindu radical government of India stemming from the inclusion of this sentence of mine to the essay on the Indian President's residence (to which he took umbrage): "Formerly known as the 'Mughal Gardens,' it was rechristened by the right-wing Hindutva Bharatiya Janata Party to Amrit Udyan in 2023." It's amusing how you mor0ns inevitably snowballed it to such proportions that it led to this. The fact that the imbecile with whom I had a spat deliberately tried to indulge in subterfuge by decrying my characterisation as false by suggesting the President, and not the Prime Minister, authorised this rechristening to obscure India's Muslim heritage, and that you luddites lapped up the waters like naive dogs, just illustrates how absurd this whole endeavour is. The President rubberstamps whatever the Hindu radicals want her to, and yet, I couldn't be more surprised by the mulish pretentiousness—almost similar to that of rabid mongrels—exhibited by the likes of someone as despicable as Cullen328, you, BlueSonnet (the girl needs to touch some grass and preface all her statements with the fact she suffers from ADHD, and, as such, should not be considered rational or grounded), | |||
| :::::I was not granted an avenue to defend myself—something that blatantly defies the presumption of innocence principle—but rather, asked to express my contrition without being allowed to speak for myself. If mor0ns of your kind touch grass someday, I believe this anomaly will resolve all by itself, no intervention will be warranted. | |||
| :::::Also, it's hilarious how you dilettantes and despicable creatures are incapable of discerning words penned by an actual human from the spiel regurgitated by an LLM. I wasn't aware of the fact that using more than two syllables is sufficient to render your brood of mentally handicapped ingrates catatonic. I was repeatedly accused—without a smidgen of evidence—of using an LLM to compose my responses, even though it couldn't be further from the truth. @], I humbly beseech thee to read more literature, for your derisive, unfounded remarks reveal insights into a stunted mental apparatus. I work on machine learning models for a living, and I can abundantly assure you that LLMs do not compose sentences in a fashion I do, however peculiar. The fact that you did not address the concerns in any capacity, but rather, prattled about something parenthetical like an unbridled lunatic does not inspire confidence. "Thesaurus-infused word-vomit," really? Facile beyond measure, but I do not have high hopes in the British education system. Your trenchant words have no impact on me, so spare me your "professional" annotations. They are irrelevant. | |||
| :::::My appeals were exceptionally long since the w@nker who referred me to the ANI made baseless allegations while depriving one of the ability to gauge the context. It's ridiculously easy to hurl unsubstantiated allegations, but it's tedious to defend oneself. I wrote those comprehensive responses as I was driven to believe—falsely, if I may add—that you trogl0dytes genuinely pay obeisance to impartiality by considering all facts at hand and do not impetuously come to conclusions. Boy, I was wrong! | |||
| :::::That explains the despicable editorial standards prevalent at Misplaced Pages, but that's a separate tale of its own. I am quite certain that creatures like Cullen328, who I am quite certain is a pretentious w@nker with nothing but three cats to himself, wouldn't wish for the gravy to cease in any capacity, precisely why he swiftly repudiates any insinuations implying Misplaced Pages's parent body being cash-rich. How else would a certified grifter, a man sans any conscience or a speck of integrity in his grubby body, sustain himself in such perilous times while concurrently selling himself out for $50/hr "consultancy gigs"? | |||
| :::::Moreover, I am not obligated to comply with a passing remark made by an individual (that BlueSonnet creature, if I recall correctly) whose cantankerousness is only eclipsed by her inability to parse multiple paragraphs owing to an unresolved ADHD complex. You can retain the unsavoury remarks you previously issued, for, unlike your compatriots, I am not precisely daunted by criticism in the slightest. | |||
| :::::If you think this spurious façade of an outcome will deter me from editing Misplaced Pages, you are inordinately mistaken. Grovel, crawl, beg for donations till Kingdom Come, but it won't cease. | |||
| :::::Auf wiedersehen. These are the ratiocinations of a fellow whose disgruntlement has eclipsed intolerable bounds. To belabour the same notion over and over again without any remedy does indeed suggest the collective rabble of ungulates I had the misfortune to interact with are exceptionally unhinged. | |||
| :::::I address the following remark specifically to you, Blue-Sonnet: you could've composed your words less rudely, miss. I know you find the nature of my composition somewhat tedious, but that gives you no right to spew the hogwash you previously did. Moreover, the frivolous accusation you parroted ad nauseam—that I use an LLM to craft my responses—suggests nothing other than the fact that you are neither accustomed with LLM nor the kind of responses it generates. Quite the indictment of the British education system. Your ADHD diagnosis is no excuse to engage in the banality you just did. YOU proffered your unrequited opinion and subsequently went ballistic when I, who was driven by the belief that perhaps you understood what I was going through owing to the travesty of a decision regarding my ban, sent a response expressing the circumstances leading to the ban. I was wrong; boy, I was wrong! All of you constitute the same coterie of pretentious, insufferable weasels presiding over that buddy club of yours where decisions are taken in haste, driven by nothing but hubris and megalomania. What else explains that the likes of @@] and @] indulge in a farcical circlejerk? Have some decency and shame, you luddites.] (]) 19:55, 13 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:56, 12 January 2025
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Piotr Kamler page
Hi, Yamla. I just created a stub for Polish film director Piotr Kamler. The page name came with a warning that another page under that name had been removed by you in 2015 because it was created by a banned user in 2015. I couldn't find a reference to it in your logs so I proceeded, but thought it best to check and see if there is any issue I am missing. I believe my stub is all original content. Wrightjack talk
About reference
I want to clear some doubts i agree i made some disruptive edits on 1991 killing and Har krisha which was reverted and i didn't edit that page again but can you explain me how i made disruptive edit on Punjab king's As I said earlier, I only changed the words and there was no source mentioned even before my edit on Punjab Kings. Jaspreetsingh6 (talk) 14:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- You added new content. You are required to cite that content. That the previous, different information was unsourced is not an excuse. --Yamla (talk) 15:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- okay i will keep that in mind Just last question like page When I edit the list of battle or list of Sikhs page, Do I have to mention reference?, Because this is type of page are just list where people and Battles are mentioned, which already have Misplaced Pages pages. Jaspreetsingh6 (talk) 15:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- and i am not making any excuse it's just i feel block warning was not necessary in Punjab king case Jaspreetsingh6 (talk) 15:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages policy requires citations "for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space." (WP:CITE) --Yamla (talk) 15:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay i think it's help me to improve thank you Jaspreetsingh6 (talk) 15:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages policy requires citations "for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space." (WP:CITE) --Yamla (talk) 15:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2025
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RFC, Misplaced Pages:Notability (species) was adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
Technical news
- The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.
Arbitration
- Following the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: CaptainEek, Daniel, Elli, KrakatoaKatie, Liz, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, Theleekycauldron, Worm That Turned.
Miscellaneous
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
IP block exemption
I am not able to contribute to English Misplaced Pages because my IP address is used in an open proxy (sometimes I use mobile data, and it still shows the same that my IP is blocked for open proxy). I have been using English Misplaced Pages for more than 6 months and have made 7000+ edits and want to contribute more and more, but because of this problem, I am unable to do so. (I also mailed to Wikimedia stewards, and in reply they said that, to contact a checkuser directly ) In these circumstances, it will be very helpful for me if you grant me the IP address block exemption access and allow me to contribute to the English or global Misplaced Pages. Thank you. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 20:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please clarify. That you are able to edit this page and that you have made 7000+ edits means that you are able to edit without WP:IPBE. To be clear, I'm not accusing you or saying you are ineligible for IPBE, only that I'm unsure why you think you need it. Please clarify. --Yamla (talk) 22:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Yamla, I am able to edit this page because I used mobile data from another operator and was able to edit it, but in my home, where I use Wi-Fi, I am facing the issue that my IP is blocked for open proxy. I hope that you understand my situation. Mobile data is expensive in my country, so using it frequently is not easy for me. Thanks. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 00:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm confused as to why you deleted my topic
Hi!
I've added a topic recently on the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel article's talk page. You then deleted it on January 7th.
I'm not an experienced contributor, so if I've broken some kind of Misplaced Pages rule, I would greatly appreciate it if you could tell me about it. As I was trying to help, it came out as a bit aggressive to see my comment be deleted with no real explanation.
Conversely, if you disagree with the comment itself, the place to discuss that is the talk page, and deletion doesn't seem like an adequate reaction.
Have a great day,
Max Maxime182752 (talk) 01:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please see what I left at the time on your talk page. You aren't permitted to edit articles or talk pages about the Arab-Israeli conflict as you are not an extended-confirmed user, except with a few small exceptions. That is, you haven't made enough edits yet to contribute in that controversial subject area. Again, please thoroughly read the material I left at the time on your talk page. --Yamla (talk) 02:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your answer.
- I've already read what you left on my talk page, and it makes no mention of talk pages at all. I also had a look at the page for contentious topics which was linked, and nowhere could I find any mention of a ban on editing talk pages, let alone a systematic ban for all users that don't have enough privileges. In general, the snippet seems to mostly ask for good behaviour, which I believe I had. Maybe you posted the wrong snippet on my page? In any case, if you have a specific rule in mind, I would love to know where to read it in the documentation, I thrive to become a better Wikipedian.
- You also mention that I have restrictions as I'm not an extended-confirmed user, but from what I can see they seem to be automatically enforced, as I can't edit the page. Are you saying that the systematic ban from edititing the page is automatically enforced, but that there's a similar ban for the talk-page that high privilege users have to enforce by hand?
- Please don't see this as resistance to criticism or bad faith, I am truly confused as to what's happening, and from my perspective, looking at the snippet you left on my talk page and the page for contentious topics only makes it seem like nothing in this situation should prevent me from writing in the talk page.
- Hopefully, understanding what I did wrong this time should help me avoid repeating the same mistake in the future ^^
- Have a great day,
- Max Maxime182752 (talk) 06:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note that I'm not claiming you were editing in bad faith. I agree that you exhibited "good behaviour" and were clearly editing in good faith. You weren't aware of the restrictions, which is why I let you know. Specifically, check out Misplaced Pages:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict. In that subject area, the "Extended confirmed restriction" applies. You are not yet an "extended confirmed" editor, meaning you are not permitted to edit in that topic area. That includes talk pages. Frankly, the standard template I left on your talk page does not do a great job of spelling this out so it's no wonder you were unaware. Talk:October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel includes some additional information at the top (see "Warning: active arbitration remedies"), but I wouldn't expect people to notice that unless it was specifically brought to their attention. In summary, you need to avoid editing in that subject area until you are "extended-confirmed", which happens automatically on accounts at least 30 days old and which have made at least 500 edits. --Yamla (talk) 12:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)