| Revision as of 01:59, 3 May 2007 editKukini (talk | contribs)55,597 edits →Your problematic user list← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:03, 3 May 2007 edit undoKukini (talk | contribs)55,597 edits archiving talk pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| {{-}}{{-}} | {{-}}{{-}} | ||
| '''Write below here''' | '''Write below here''' | ||
| == user 207.69.138.137 == | |||
| Someone with the ip 207.69.138.137 has been committing petty vandalism (see article Certiorari), and I have seen you have warned this user before. Can you block this individual.--] 22:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RFCN == | |||
| Why? I already knew the user's explanation of what his name meant and his reason for picking it was. I wasn't looking for it to be blocked, I just wanted to know what other people thought. I wasn't looking for him to have to ''change'' his name... I was just '''requesting comments''' on the username. I made him aware of the RfC, and he could have commented there if he wanted. I'll continue to ignore all rules if it helps me. But you're more than welcome to choose a different way. Mahalo. --] 19:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, I just read the top part of that page again. So basically you all are saying it's not really a "Request for '''comments'''" page, but rather a "request to have this name blocked or changed" page. I wanted neither... I wanted ''comments'' on the name. I guess I'll just have to use the admin's noticeboard from now on. Mahalo, Kukini. --] 21:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ] is under Good Article review | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:GA/R ]<sup> ]</sup> 02:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Unblock me plz == | |||
| My retard brother vandalized doent mean i should b blocked{{unsigned|Haatweels}} | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my userpage, I appreciate it! Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>]</sup></font></b> 19:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == i just wanted to thank you == | |||
| i just wanted to thank you for commenting on my page and giving me that great advice. sincerly sodaman --] 21:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==] et. al.== | |||
| Sounds good. I also advised Evo that ] is a possibility if he does not agree with the deletion.--] 12:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I think, based on the article I deleted, that your approach is the correct one in this case. ] is pretty much intended to be an mechanism for reviewing a deletion or AFD close where it appears the decision was done out of process or against consensus. I don't think my speedy deletion of this article would be particularly controversial in a DRV, but I wanted to at least let the creator know that it exists as an option.--] 16:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ah, I just noticed the admin icon... you probably didn't need that DRV explaination :)--] 16:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Sounds good, I'll take a look at it when you get done.--] 14:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Help on Farpoint Media == | |||
| I made a few minor tweaks, and added a ref to the version of Farpoint Media that's in your Sandbox currently. I also put a URL in there to an episode of Cover to Cover which was an anniversary show where they spoke some about the early days of Farpoint Media. I haven't had a chance yet to relisten to the podcast and take notes. I may be able to later this week or maybe this coming weekend, but made sure to leave the URL in case someone else had time or I wasn't able to get to it. Getting Evo involved would get the best information, but then there's the concern of ] and possible perceived issues around ]. - ] 18:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry for butting in here. :o) I don't think there is any problem in getting information from Evo or other members of the Farpoint family, as long as we do the actual writing. --] 19:21, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Good to hear from you both. I hope that we can strengthen this article and the one on podiobooks to bring them back with verifiability and clear notability. Best, --] <sup> ]</sup> 20:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Haatweels== | |||
| oh, my bad...I tried editing from my school and thats blocked. That's why. Haatweels{{unsigned|Haatweels}} | |||
| ==pidgin, ah?== | |||
| ho baddah u speak da kine ah? I neva wen tink da kine gon be up hea on da wikipedia, ah? bu lai, badah. good ting neva cockaroach da kine good kanaka maoli words ah? | |||
| so how I kno u can speak da kine pidgin o wot? unokea? ainokea. nah, i do. u no da good kine jokes in pidgin o wot? | |||
| ] 23:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hi from Schools== | |||
| I see you have helped the schools project with adding assessments. Could you add you comments on these schools to ]. This helps us keep track of who is working on assessments. Thanks ] 09:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Re: 'Sup Brah== | |||
| Hi Kukini, | |||
| no, I do not know Kuākini, but good to know that there are others from Hawai'i all the way out here on the East Coast! | |||
| My comment had a purpose: please know that claiming to know and practice "local kine Pidgin" is a pretty weighty statement, akin to being a kanaka and identifying with hawaiian sovereignty issues and such. I realize that wikipedia userpages are intended to be pretty arbitrary and non-weighty space, but use the pidgin moniker with care. A simple 'sup brah could lead you into trouble were you to ever visit the state, especially being a haole. If you just put the tag up on your userpage as a joke, I'd ask that you remove it. If you do know and practice pidgin, then by all means keep it up there. | |||
| thanks, | |||
| 128.103.171.158 23:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC), or, ] 23:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==You helped choose ] as this week's ] winner== | |||
| {| class="notice noprint" style="background: PapayaWhip; border: 1px solid SteelBlue; margin: 0 auto; text-align: center" | |||
| |]||Thank you for your support of the ''']'''.<br>This week ''']''' was selected to be improved to ] ].<br>Hope you can help. | |||
| |} ] 00:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: questions of authentication == | |||
| hi kukini, | |||
| this is not an issue of where you were born/where you grew up. Haunani K. Trask was born in California of all places, and she tries to cover that up as much as possible. Personally, I think it's a bit problematic for her to do so and am in the process of publishing several articles critiquing the rhetoric of her and other hawaiian studies specialists. And no offense, but growing up on the north shore is no biggie. Almost like saying you're from kailua. Notice the flack from Catherine Toth's blog on the Honolulu Advertiser about maui fever and all the haoles who try to be local. | |||
| And this doesn't come down to race. I know plenty of moke caucasians who can speak pidgin; at the same time there are plenty of haoles (and locals) up here at Harvard from Hawaii who can't speak and understand a word of pidgin. Morphophonemic iteration in writing is also problematic; paul theroux, probably one of the more prolific writers on contemporary hawaii (but ignored by the academy, probability because he's haole) writes haole as "howlee"--but then again he's not dealing with a Hawaiian readership. I understand where he's coming from in the tradition of Mark Twain and regionalist writing, but his adherence to strict phonemic writing precludes him from serious consideration by local writers. At the same time, Trask continually defends her use of pidgin in published poetry, despite her near-complete disregard by the rest of the academy. | |||
| I only mention that since you seem focused on Arizona/Oklahoma issues. Not that I don't know any kanakas who have moved up there, but I'd assume a more passionate focus on Hawaiian issues to authenticate your claim to pidgin roots. My crew coach went to hana hauoli for all of one year as a military brat, and yet he still signs his name "Aloha, Bob" even though he hasn't been back to the state since he was eight years old. That's more of an issue of groping for identity than authenticity. | |||
| And even then, do you really speak pidgin or would you get a false crack to the face if you tried back in the aina? Just curious. | |||
| ] 01:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *This from a user who calls me a toolbag. --] <sup> ]</sup> 02:50, 25 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| **Oh...and CREW? Crew is so very ]...I was team capt. of my outrigger team. ] <sup> ]</sup> 02:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank You! == | |||
| Thanx for telling me that if im bored i could go to random articles. Some of them are pretty interesting.] 01:45, 27 April 2007 (UTC) User: 24.218.139.157 | |||
| :Not something I told this individual. --] <sup> ]</sup> 01:46, 27 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == hey you doing A lot of RC patroling eh? == | |||
| You were on the same page as me trying to undo the mess and well you beated me to it lol] 16:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Thanks for that kind and warm welcome message you left on my talk page! I really like that particular Welcome template that you utilized on my talk page because I think It adds a bit of a personal touch to a regular welcome message. I greatly appreciate it. You have my gratitude, Friend. Thanks Again! Sincerely, --] 01:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hello== | |||
| ]]] | |||
| == ] == | |||
| You reverted my edit on ]. Why? ] 19:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Disregard; we obviously passed in the night on this one. Feel free to discuss on my talk page. ] 19:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Response made on talkpage. --] <sup> ]</sup> 19:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your problematic user list == | |||
| {{tlsx|attack|2=User:Kukini/problematic user list}} Couldn't resist, but seriously - what policy says they can't remove notices from their own talk pages? --] 22:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Perhaps I should move that to another titled page...but it is to help me keep track of users who are disparaging and then delete notices of editing concerns. Do you perceive paying attention to these issues an "attack?" --] <sup> ]</sup> 22:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::(feel free to just reply here, i'm removing the copy on my talk page to avoid duplication) - I investigated further, and you flagged Chromaticity for blanking a _welcome_ - while there's a significant minority who believe that warning notices should be retained, I'm absolutely baffled by his inclusion based on the diff you provided. And listing him as a POV-pusher (it may not have been your intention, but you did not separate out the list) while providing no evidence of that, I think, steps awfully close to the "personal attack" line --] 22:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::OK...well I stand corrected. Time to move along as I corrected the page. --] <sup> ]</sup> 22:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Regardless, why should people have to archive your welcome notice? It's preserved in their history, and for that matter, on your original subpage. There's no recognized requirement to archive rather than removing material from a user talk page. A welcome notice doesn't really even have any "value" the way stuff like warnings are argued to - once they've seen it, what purpose does leaving it there serve? --] 22:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::The above is beginning to appear like an attack. I am done with it. ] <sup> ]</sup> 01:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:03, 3 May 2007
edit count | edit summary usage
| Talk |
| Current discussion |
|
My admin logs: Write below here |