| Revision as of 14:28, 14 August 2003 editIhcoyc (talk | contribs)30,401 editsm Suppose I ought to mention the Whigs somewhere← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:35, 14 August 2003 edit undoDerek Ross (talk | contribs)Administrators20,228 editsm sp & minor changesNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Whig history''' is a ] name given to a view of history that is shared by a number of ] and ] ] writers on ] subjects. It takes its name from the British ]s, advocates of the power of ], who opposed the ], advocates of the power of the ]. | '''Whig history''' is a ] name given to a view of history that is shared by a number of ] and ] ] writers on ] subjects. It takes its name from the British ]s, advocates of the power of ], who opposed the ], advocates of the power of the ] and the aristocracy. | ||
| The phrase was coined by the British historian ] in ], in his small but influential book ''The Whig Interpretation of History''. The characteristics of Whig history as seen by Butterfield include: | The phrase was coined by the British historian ] in ], in his small but influential book ''The Whig Interpretation of History''. The characteristics of Whig history as seen by Butterfield include: | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| * Assuming that political figures in the past held current political beliefs; | * Assuming that political figures in the past held current political beliefs; | ||
| * Assuming that British history was a march of ] whose inevitable outcome was the constitutional monarchy; and | * Assuming that British history was a march of ] whose inevitable outcome was the constitutional monarchy; and | ||
| * Presenting political figures of the past as ]es, who advanced the cause of this political |
* Presenting political figures of the past as ]es, who advanced the cause of this political progress, or ]s, who sought to hinder its inevitable triumph. | ||
| A number of well known books exemplify these tendencies. Sir ]'s '']'' contains many of the assumptions of Whig history in an earlier form. ]'s ''Constitutional History of England'' shows many of the traits of Whig history. But perhaps the |
A number of well known books exemplify these tendencies. Sir ]'s '']'' contains many of the assumptions of Whig history in an earlier form. ]'s ''Constitutional History of England'' shows many of the traits of Whig history. But perhaps the pinnacle of Whig history is exemplified by ]'s multivolume ''History of England from the Accession of James II'', whose first chapter affirms that: | ||
| :. . . the history of our country during the last hundred and sixty years is eminently the history of physical, of moral, and of intellectual improvement. | :. . . the history of our country during the last hundred and sixty years is eminently the history of physical, of moral, and of intellectual improvement. | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| Whig history, despite its flaws as an interpretation of the past, remains valuable. Its interpretation of past events may be open to question, but even its flaws remain instructive; it reveals what respectably liberal Britons at the times in which it was written believed about politics. It turns history into an epic tale of dramatic struggles, told by good writers for whom historical writing was a form of literature. Though it may mislead about the motives and beliefs of its characters, it's still a good yarn. | Whig history, despite its flaws as an interpretation of the past, remains valuable. Its interpretation of past events may be open to question, but even its flaws remain instructive; it reveals what respectably liberal Britons at the times in which it was written believed about politics. It turns history into an epic tale of dramatic struggles, told by good writers for whom historical writing was a form of literature. Though it may mislead about the motives and beliefs of its characters, it's still a good yarn. | ||
| The uses to which British history was put in Whig history reveal much about the beliefs that motivated political actions in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. As such Whig history |
The uses to which British history was put in Whig history reveal much about the beliefs that motivated political actions in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. As such, Whig history -- not so much despite its flaws, but because of them -- offers a glimpse into the minds of both the British reformers and the ]. | ||
Revision as of 14:35, 14 August 2003
Whig history is a pejorative name given to a view of history that is shared by a number of eighteenth and nineteenth century British writers on historical subjects. It takes its name from the British Whigs, advocates of the power of Parliament, who opposed the Tories, advocates of the power of the King and the aristocracy.
The phrase was coined by the British historian Herbert Butterfield in 1931, in his small but influential book The Whig Interpretation of History. The characteristics of Whig history as seen by Butterfield include:
- Interpreting the past in light of the present day British constitutional political settlement; and specifically
- Viewing the British parliamentary, semi-democratic constitutional monarchy as the acme of human political development;
- Assuming that the constitutional monarchy was in fact an ideal held throughout all ages of the past, despite the observed facts of British history and the several power struggles between monarchs and parliaments;
- Assuming that political figures in the past held current political beliefs;
- Assuming that British history was a march of progress whose inevitable outcome was the constitutional monarchy; and
- Presenting political figures of the past as heroes, who advanced the cause of this political progress, or villains, who sought to hinder its inevitable triumph.
A number of well known books exemplify these tendencies. Sir William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England contains many of the assumptions of Whig history in an earlier form. Henry Hallam's Constitutional History of England shows many of the traits of Whig history. But perhaps the pinnacle of Whig history is exemplified by Thomas Macaulay's multivolume History of England from the Accession of James II, whose first chapter affirms that:
- . . . the history of our country during the last hundred and sixty years is eminently the history of physical, of moral, and of intellectual improvement.
Whig history, despite its flaws as an interpretation of the past, remains valuable. Its interpretation of past events may be open to question, but even its flaws remain instructive; it reveals what respectably liberal Britons at the times in which it was written believed about politics. It turns history into an epic tale of dramatic struggles, told by good writers for whom historical writing was a form of literature. Though it may mislead about the motives and beliefs of its characters, it's still a good yarn.
The uses to which British history was put in Whig history reveal much about the beliefs that motivated political actions in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. As such, Whig history -- not so much despite its flaws, but because of them -- offers a glimpse into the minds of both the British reformers and the American revolutionaries.