Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Grand Duchy of Avram: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:58, 10 May 2007 editGene Poole (talk | contribs)7,821 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 23:06, 10 May 2007 edit undoKingboyk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users57,425 edits ?Next edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
This seems to be a local news story wrapped up as a "micronation". Only 2 sources are provided: a regional newspaper, and a coin collectors' magazine - fails ]. Only 3 , only 1 if micronation articles are discounted. Questionable ]. ] 21:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC) This seems to be a local news story wrapped up as a "micronation". Only 2 sources are provided: a regional newspaper, and a coin collectors' magazine - fails ]. Only 3 , only 1 if micronation articles are discounted. Questionable ]. ] 21:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
:'''Keep'''. Spurious nomination. --] 22:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC) :'''Keep'''. Spurious nomination. --] 22:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
::How can it be spurious to nominate an unsourced, near-orphan article on an unencyclopedic topic?? --] 23:06, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:06, 10 May 2007

Grand Duchy of Avram

Grand Duchy of Avram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This seems to be a local news story wrapped up as a "micronation". Only 2 sources are provided: a regional newspaper, and a coin collectors' magazine - fails WP:RS. Only 3 incoming links from mainspace, only 1 if micronation articles are discounted. Questionable notability. kingboyk 21:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Keep. Spurious nomination. --Gene_poole 22:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
How can it be spurious to nominate an unsourced, near-orphan article on an unencyclopedic topic?? --kingboyk 23:06, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Categories: