Revision as of 22:58, 10 May 2007 editGene Poole (talk | contribs)7,821 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:06, 10 May 2007 edit undoKingboyk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users57,425 edits ?Next edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This seems to be a local news story wrapped up as a "micronation". Only 2 sources are provided: a regional newspaper, and a coin collectors' magazine - fails ]. Only 3 , only 1 if micronation articles are discounted. Questionable ]. ] 21:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC) | This seems to be a local news story wrapped up as a "micronation". Only 2 sources are provided: a regional newspaper, and a coin collectors' magazine - fails ]. Only 3 , only 1 if micronation articles are discounted. Questionable ]. ] 21:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
:'''Keep'''. Spurious nomination. --] 22:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC) | :'''Keep'''. Spurious nomination. --] 22:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
::How can it be spurious to nominate an unsourced, near-orphan article on an unencyclopedic topic?? --] 23:06, 10 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:06, 10 May 2007
Grand Duchy of Avram
- Grand Duchy of Avram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This seems to be a local news story wrapped up as a "micronation". Only 2 sources are provided: a regional newspaper, and a coin collectors' magazine - fails WP:RS. Only 3 incoming links from mainspace, only 1 if micronation articles are discounted. Questionable notability. kingboyk 21:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Spurious nomination. --Gene_poole 22:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- How can it be spurious to nominate an unsourced, near-orphan article on an unencyclopedic topic?? --kingboyk 23:06, 10 May 2007 (UTC)