Misplaced Pages

Transfermium Wars: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:15, 31 July 2002 edit24.27.58.16 (talk)No edit summary  Revision as of 23:26, 31 July 2002 edit undo24.27.58.16 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
The three groups which conflicted over elemental naming were an American group The three groups which conflicted over elemental naming were an American group
in Berkeley, a Russian group at Dubna, and a German group. in Berkeley, a Russian group at Dubna, and a German group.

The names preferred by the Americans were

104 - rutherfordium
105 - hahnium
106 - seaborgium

The names preferred by the Russians were

104 - kurchatovium
105 - neilsbohrium

In 1994, the IUPAC proposed the following names

104 - dubnium
105 - joliotiumm
106 - rutherfordium
107 - bohrium
108 - hahnium
109 - meitnerium

This was objected to by the American Chemical Society.

Finally in 1997, the following names were agreed to

104 - rutherfordium
105 - dubnium
106 - seaborgium
107 - bohrium
108 - hassium
109 - meitnerium

Revision as of 23:26, 31 July 2002

The names for the chemical elements 104 to 108 have been the subject of a major controversy starting in the 1960's which was only finally resolved in 1997. The issue is that by convention an element was named by its discoverers which led to controversy when multiple groups claimed discovery simulatenously. The three groups which conflicted over elemental naming were an American group in Berkeley, a Russian group at Dubna, and a German group.

The names preferred by the Americans were

104 - rutherfordium 105 - hahnium 106 - seaborgium

The names preferred by the Russians were

104 - kurchatovium 105 - neilsbohrium

In 1994, the IUPAC proposed the following names

104 - dubnium 105 - joliotiumm 106 - rutherfordium 107 - bohrium 108 - hahnium 109 - meitnerium

This was objected to by the American Chemical Society.

Finally in 1997, the following names were agreed to

104 - rutherfordium 105 - dubnium 106 - seaborgium 107 - bohrium 108 - hassium 109 - meitnerium