Misplaced Pages

Talk:0.999...: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:03, 6 May 2005 editBradBeattie (talk | contribs)6,888 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 19:48, 6 May 2005 edit undo213.216.199.18 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


True, the title was a little slap-dash. Thanks for the improvement. --] 19:03, 6 May 2005 (UTC) True, the title was a little slap-dash. Thanks for the improvement. --] 19:03, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

"In mathematics, one could easily fall in the trap of thinking that while 0.999... is certainly close to 1, nevertheless the two are not equal. Here's a proof that they actually are."

0,999... is ''irrational'' and so is the the article.

Revision as of 19:48, 6 May 2005

I created this page in response to two threads I saw and the confusion that arose. Figured it was something worth noting. --BradBeattie 18:58, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

I think you are right. I submitted it first for deletion because the title looked a bit misleading. This is not a series of nines, the series is if you wish of
9 10 n {\displaystyle {\frac {9}{10^{n}}}}

Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov 19:01, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

True, the title was a little slap-dash. Thanks for the improvement. --BradBeattie 19:03, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

"In mathematics, one could easily fall in the trap of thinking that while 0.999... is certainly close to 1, nevertheless the two are not equal. Here's a proof that they actually are."

0,999... is irrational and so is the the article.