Misplaced Pages

Talk:Al Franken: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:35, 7 August 2004 editMeelar (talk | contribs)Administrators29,708 edits ::::Looks fine to me, then. Best, ~~~~← Previous edit Revision as of 23:39, 9 May 2005 edit undoMhaile (talk | contribs)8 edits HeyNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:


::::Looks fine to me, then. Best, ] ]]] 16:35, 2004 Aug 7 (UTC) ::::Looks fine to me, then. Best, ] ]]] 16:35, 2004 Aug 7 (UTC)

== Hey ==

Can we use a picture that's not an advertisment for his CD?

Revision as of 23:39, 9 May 2005

I deleted a phrase that began, "It is rumoured..." one, because we can do better than rumours (or rumors); and also, this article is about Franken, not the Fox pundit who is rumoured to have been behind Fox's ill-fated lawsuit.Mbstone 00:46, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC)


Also, lots of people are described in Misplaced Pages as "funny" and/or "successful" and/or "famous." Maybe all three together is a little POV, but each of these terms is accurate as pertains to Franken, and perhaps the people who delete these characterizations are proving to everyone how absolutely humorless some fanatics of a certain right-wing-propaganda cable channel can sometimes be.Mbstone 00:50, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Recent edits

Please do not remove material; instead, we try to add in other material to make the article follow Misplaced Pages:NPOV. If you have a problem with the current content, please feel free to discuss it here. Best, ] 16:07, 2004 Aug 7 (UTC)


Thejackhmr this article needed some adjustment; it had some subjective lines that needed to be redacted in order to comply with Misplaced Pages:NPOV. Perhaps they could be reworded by the author and reinserted.

I've tried a compromise version; see what you think. ] 16:22, 2004 Aug 7 (UTC)
Thejackhmr Perfect... Just one setence removed; was oddly worded, quasi-subjective, unsubstantial and possibly redundant:
In an appearance on Late Night with Conan O'Brien in 2004, Franken claimed that Fox was either claiming rights to the phrase "fair and balanced" itself, or to ironical usage of it.

Looks fine to me, then. Best, ] 16:35, 2004 Aug 7 (UTC)

Hey

Can we use a picture that's not an advertisment for his CD?