| Revision as of 23:04, 19 April 2005 edit134.50.45.121 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:05, 12 May 2005 edit undoGleagle (talk | contribs)29 edits I don't have a lot of free research timeNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| *Although Dr. Warren has many followers, his Purpose Driven teaching has given rise to many critics as well. Prominent names such as ] and ] to name a few. Might it be prudent to discuss the opposition? Or is that too controversial? | *Although Dr. Warren has many followers, his Purpose Driven teaching has given rise to many critics as well. Prominent names such as ] and ] to name a few. Might it be prudent to discuss the opposition? Or is that too controversial? | ||
| == I don't have a lot of free research time == | |||
| I have heard, but am currently unable to cross reference/verify, that Rick Warren has been able to repay his church his entire salary, and that he works as a 'volunteer pastor' using his book as his income. Do you think this would be relevant to the entry if it could be verified? | |||
Revision as of 03:05, 12 May 2005
this whole article appears to be an ad
Should it be referenced like that?
- Although Dr. Warren has many followers, his Purpose Driven teaching has given rise to many critics as well. Prominent names such as John F. MacArthur and Dave Hunt to name a few. Might it be prudent to discuss the opposition? Or is that too controversial?
I don't have a lot of free research time
I have heard, but am currently unable to cross reference/verify, that Rick Warren has been able to repay his church his entire salary, and that he works as a 'volunteer pastor' using his book as his income. Do you think this would be relevant to the entry if it could be verified?