User talk:Anonyymi: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:40, 6 June 2007 editAnonyymi (talk \| contribs)17 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:12, 6 June 2007 edit undoErachima (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users16,650 edits He made all of ONE discussion edit, and it was a reasoned opinion.Next edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:

	So, this looks like a ban based on dispute to me, which should be not accetable reason for a ban, as stated in ].}}		So, this looks like a ban based on dispute to me, which should be not accetable reason for a ban, as stated in ].}}


			*'''Comment''' This user has only made 1 substantial discussion edit, , and it was a reasoned opinion and most definitely not trolling. Unless there's something in the deleted history, a block in this case was completely inappropriate. --] <small>]</small> 22:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:12, 6 June 2007

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages from SqueakBox! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome, SqueakBox 01:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Anonyymi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Seems like Ryulong, the admin who banned me, doesn't want to answer my email about this matter, so I'll just post here. Here is a copy of the message that I sent to Ryulong via email:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Anonyymi here. I see that you banned me for "trolling" for indefinite period. Just how exactly did I "troll" to deserve this ban? If I recall correctly, I only took part in the discussion about the new image in the Lolicon article. I didn't even edit the article or anything (well, I couldn't, because it was already semi-protected by the time I started discussing with my IP address before creating this account). Why can't I say that "people just want this deleted because they don't like it", and how is this trolling? Many people agree with this, are they trolls too? If that's enough for "trolling", why was I the only one to get banned? I seriously want this thing to get solved, and it won't really help if people start banning other people for not being in their side in the matter. So basically, I was NOT trolling, I was just expressing my opinion and thoughts on the matter, thus, this ban is unfair, and I want it removed. - Anonyymi

So, this looks like a ban based on dispute to me, which should be not accetable reason for a ban, as stated in Misplaced Pages:Blocking_policy#Disputes.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Seems like Ryulong, the admin who banned me, doesn't want to answer my email about this matter, so I'll just post here. Here is a copy of the message that I sent to Ryulong via email:
'' http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Anonyymi here. I see that you banned me for "trolling" for indefinite period. Just how exactly did I "troll" to deserve this ban? If I recall correctly, I only took part in the discussion about the new image in the Lolicon article. I didn't even edit the article or anything (well, I couldn't, because it was already semi-protected by the time I started discussing with my IP address before creating this account). Why can't I say that "people just want this deleted because they don't like it", and how is this trolling? Many people agree with this, are they trolls too? If that's enough for "trolling", why was I the only one to get banned? I seriously want this thing to get solved, and it won't really help if people start banning other people for not being in their side in the matter. So basically, I was NOT trolling, I was just expressing my opinion and thoughts on the matter, thus, this ban is unfair, and I want it removed. - Anonyymi ''
So, this looks like a ban based on dispute to me, which should be not accetable reason for a ban, as stated in ]. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Seems like Ryulong, the admin who banned me, doesn't want to answer my email about this matter, so I'll just post here. Here is a copy of the message that I sent to Ryulong via email:
'' http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Anonyymi here. I see that you banned me for "trolling" for indefinite period. Just how exactly did I "troll" to deserve this ban? If I recall correctly, I only took part in the discussion about the new image in the Lolicon article. I didn't even edit the article or anything (well, I couldn't, because it was already semi-protected by the time I started discussing with my IP address before creating this account). Why can't I say that "people just want this deleted because they don't like it", and how is this trolling? Many people agree with this, are they trolls too? If that's enough for "trolling", why was I the only one to get banned? I seriously want this thing to get solved, and it won't really help if people start banning other people for not being in their side in the matter. So basically, I was NOT trolling, I was just expressing my opinion and thoughts on the matter, thus, this ban is unfair, and I want it removed. - Anonyymi ''
So, this looks like a ban based on dispute to me, which should be not accetable reason for a ban, as stated in ]. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Seems like Ryulong, the admin who banned me, doesn't want to answer my email about this matter, so I'll just post here. Here is a copy of the message that I sent to Ryulong via email:
'' http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Anonyymi here. I see that you banned me for "trolling" for indefinite period. Just how exactly did I "troll" to deserve this ban? If I recall correctly, I only took part in the discussion about the new image in the Lolicon article. I didn't even edit the article or anything (well, I couldn't, because it was already semi-protected by the time I started discussing with my IP address before creating this account). Why can't I say that "people just want this deleted because they don't like it", and how is this trolling? Many people agree with this, are they trolls too? If that's enough for "trolling", why was I the only one to get banned? I seriously want this thing to get solved, and it won't really help if people start banning other people for not being in their side in the matter. So basically, I was NOT trolling, I was just expressing my opinion and thoughts on the matter, thus, this ban is unfair, and I want it removed. - Anonyymi ''
So, this looks like a ban based on dispute to me, which should be not accetable reason for a ban, as stated in ]. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Comment This user has only made 1 substantial discussion edit, , and it was a reasoned opinion and most definitely not trolling. Unless there's something in the deleted history, a block in this case was completely inappropriate. --tjstrf talk 22:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Category:

Requests for unblock