Misplaced Pages

Transfermium Wars: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:08, 1 August 2002 editPierreAbbat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,330 editsm sp← Previous edit Revision as of 23:06, 3 August 2002 edit undo24.27.58.16 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
:104 - kurchatovium :104 - kurchatovium
:105 - nielsbohrium :105 - nielsbohrium

Element 104 was named after ] who was father of the
Russian atomic bomb, and this was one reason the name was objectionable
to the Americans. The American name to 106 was objectable to some
because ] was still alive.


In 1994, the ] proposed the following names In 1994, the ] proposed the following names
Line 23: Line 28:
:109 - ] :109 - ]


This was objected to by the ]. This attempted to resolve the dispute by replacing the name for 104 with
a name after the the Dubna research center, and to not name 106 after
Seaborg.

This was objected to by the ] on the grounds
that the discovery of 106 by an American group was not in question and
that group should have the right to name the element whatever it wanted
to. In addition, given that many American books had already used 104 and
105 for rutherfordium and hahnium, the ACS objected to those names being
used for other elements.


Finally in 1997, the following names were agreed to Finally in 1997, the following names were agreed to
:104 - rutherfordium :104 - ]
:105 - ] :105 - ]
:106 - seaborgium :106 - ]
:107 - bohrium :107 - ]
:108 - ] :108 - ]
:109 - meitnerium :109 - ]

Revision as of 23:06, 3 August 2002

The names for the chemical elements 104 to 108 have been the subject of a major controversy starting in the 1960s which was only finally resolved in 1997. At issue was the convention that elements are named by their discoverers which led to controversy when multiple groups claimed discovery simultaneously. The three groups which conflicted over elemental naming were an American group in Berkeley, a Russian group at Dubna, and a German group.

The names preferred by the Americans were

104 - rutherfordium
105 - hahnium
106 - seaborgium

The names preferred by the Russians were

104 - kurchatovium
105 - nielsbohrium

Element 104 was named after Igor Kurchatov who was father of the Russian atomic bomb, and this was one reason the name was objectionable to the Americans. The American name to 106 was objectable to some because Glenn T. Seaborg was still alive.

In 1994, the IUPAC proposed the following names

104 - dubnium
105 - joliotium
106 - rutherfordium
107 - bohrium
108 - hahnium
109 - meitnerium

This attempted to resolve the dispute by replacing the name for 104 with a name after the the Dubna research center, and to not name 106 after Seaborg.

This was objected to by the American Chemical Society on the grounds that the discovery of 106 by an American group was not in question and that group should have the right to name the element whatever it wanted to. In addition, given that many American books had already used 104 and 105 for rutherfordium and hahnium, the ACS objected to those names being used for other elements.

Finally in 1997, the following names were agreed to

104 - rutherfordium
105 - dubnium
106 - seaborgium
107 - bohrium
108 - hassium
109 - meitnerium
Transfermium Wars: Difference between revisions Add topic