| Revision as of 17:16, 14 June 2007 editUltramarine (talk | contribs)33,507 edits →Mediation← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:20, 14 June 2007 edit undoGiovanni33 (talk | contribs)10,138 edits →MediationNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| Just to clarify before I proceed futher with ]. Do you accept ]? I will interpret no answer as a no.] 17:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | Just to clarify before I proceed futher with ]. Do you accept ]? I will interpret no answer as a no.] 17:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Why not just find a compromise? How about if Ultramarine, instead of deleting things he thinks lack proper referencing, he instead sticks a Fact/Cite tage, and lets it stand for a week or so, enough time for editors to properly source the material and provide proper attribution--or else discuss on talk about the merits of the issue, one way or another--BEFORE simply deleting large amounts of information? That is what I've asked him to do, and I think it would avoid these conflicts. Its the reason why we have this option and its a reasonable compromise.] 18:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:20, 14 June 2007
Hello
Mediation
Regarding our dispute, would you accept mediation, such as Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation? Ultramarine 16:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Ok i'll bite... look we don't really need mediation all I'm asking you is to not delete other people's work I have tried not to delete your work if i could help it and if you go back to all the articles and restore your own additions without deleting or changing things you believe are untrue and unsourced I will defend your contributions as well. the way i see it lack of sources is no excuse for deleting anything. just add.Esmehwp 16:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well, in Misplaced Pages anything that does not have a source can be removed anytime. Otherwise anyone can write anything without proof and it could never be removed. See Misplaced Pages:Verifiability.Ultramarine 16:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
you think I don't know WP policies? don't do that again. read my writing. if you cant understand what I'm saying to you then there's no point in talking. LAST WORD: delete and you'll be reverted. FULL STOP Esmehwp 16:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Note that if you continue to refuse to explain your editing and do not make any attempt to solve this by discussion, I will take this to the arbitration committee which can stop this sort of disruption. For example by blocking you from editing. But preferable we can avoid this by discussion instead. What do you prefer? Ultramarine 16:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Just to clarify before I proceed futher with Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution. Do you accept Misplaced Pages:Mediation? I will interpret no answer as a no.Ultramarine 17:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Why not just find a compromise? How about if Ultramarine, instead of deleting things he thinks lack proper referencing, he instead sticks a Fact/Cite tage, and lets it stand for a week or so, enough time for editors to properly source the material and provide proper attribution--or else discuss on talk about the merits of the issue, one way or another--BEFORE simply deleting large amounts of information? That is what I've asked him to do, and I think it would avoid these conflicts. Its the reason why we have this option and its a reasonable compromise.Giovanni33 18:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)