Revision as of 00:56, 19 June 2007 editSchmuckyTheCat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,944 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:57, 19 June 2007 edit undoSchmuckyTheCat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,944 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
:I think the article probably does need deletion for WP:NOT reasons, and the vagueness of its scope, however I will wait a while and see what becomes of it before I resort to AfD. ]<!-- Was HighInBC --> 00:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC) | :I think the article probably does need deletion for WP:NOT reasons, and the vagueness of its scope, however I will wait a while and see what becomes of it before I resort to AfD. ]<!-- Was HighInBC --> 00:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
::I did a cleanup and at least made a start to a realistic intro. I'll try and get at some more later. ] | ::I did a cleanup and at least made a start to a realistic intro. I'll try and get at some more later. In any case, the topic is valid even if the current content is rather a mess. ] |
Revision as of 00:57, 19 June 2007
User talk:HighInBC
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
|
Pano Head Image
Thanks !!!
I hope others contribute as well.
- Hehe, look what I did with it: Image:MV Coho in Victoria's inner harbor.jpg. 23:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I live in Anacortes. We are neighbors. Nice pano, you should post the link to the PanoTools Gallery. John Spikowski 20:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- I will check it out, thanks. 21:23, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Legal drugs
I was editing this, doing a severe formatting cleanup, when you deleted it. AFAIK, the content there is not the content that was deleted a year ago, so it's not really a recreation. If I'm wrong, delete it again, I have no access to the 2006 history, but the current article doesn't match the description ih the AfD log. SchmuckyTheCat
- I will take a closer look and get back to you in about 3-5 minutes okay? 00:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- It would seem you are correct, sorry about that. I have restored the post AfD revisions. 00:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- I think the article probably does need deletion for WP:NOT reasons, and the vagueness of its scope, however I will wait a while and see what becomes of it before I resort to AfD. 00:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- I did a cleanup and at least made a start to a realistic intro. I'll try and get at some more later. In any case, the topic is valid even if the current content is rather a mess. SchmuckyTheCat