| Revision as of 12:18, 26 June 2007 editGuilpert (talk | contribs)33 edits Restoring list of Tecmobowl's issues/bannings on Misplaced Pages. So other users don't have to slog through his page blankings.← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:19, 26 June 2007 edit undoTecmobowl (talk | contribs)3,160 edits sounds good to me... did you know that tacos are not always from mexicoNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| blanked | |||
| .. | |||
| Well....you just got caught. ] showed up on my talk page. How would he know about that conversation? It isn't because you told him...you told but somehow El redactor knew anyway. Blocked as an obvious sock. Your block will be extended for using sockpuppets to evade your block. More ]. <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 19:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=This is SUCH bullshit!!! YOU ARE THE ONE WITH THE COI!!! Look at the edit history, he showed up on your talk page after you commented on the Jackson article. It doesn't take much to see that you have TOTALLY abused your rights as admin. I will be exploring ways to have you removed. Unbelievable...TOTALLY UNBELIEVABLE!!!|decline=I'm not even going to look at what you said. Come back when you have calmed down and are ready to discuss civilly. — ''']''' 23:26, 12 June 2007 (UTC)}} | |||
| Nope. The from El redactor was to that talk page and somehow he already knew about me and my edit history in removing that link from articles. Odd, no? Additionally, the only two days that editor has edited are when you are under a block. That's one hell of a coincidence. <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 23:25, 12 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I am fully willing to be civil, but this abuse of power is ridiculous. Irish guy, the guy looked at a page you edited. I'm sorry, but it sounds like you are using a tremendous amount of supposition here. Get the information correct please before you go around and abuse your power.|decline=The unblock template is to be used to explain why you believe your block was invalid, not for soapboxing and general rantings. If you continue abusing the unblock template, we will protect this page. Please think carefully about your next unblock request. — ] 01:56, 13 June 2007 (UTC)}} | |||
| Please tell me how he knew to look exactly 100 edits deep into my contribution history to find evidence that I removed those links from other articles. ''You'' knew I removed them, but why would he have known to look for it if you are different people? Why does he only appear when you are blocked? Why are his first edits to add your spam link back? <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 23:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| He didn't have to look 100 edits deep, he just had to look at the pages you removed it from. That post says he's doing a paper on Chicago Trials. Well, ] and ] are probably on HIS watch list. It looks like he showed up last wed or thursday and edited a few topics. One of which was shoeless joe jackson and a few of which were film related. I have touched VERY FEW film articles. You have no substance to your arguments. Unblock me please. //] 23:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| And another thing... if I were a sock, wouldn't I at least leave the notice message on the proper talk page? This is not a well based block. It turns out another person thinks the link is a legitimate addition and that the article is not as good because of it. //] 23:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock| | |||
| * I have not violated any wikipedia policies that warrant long-term banning. I was banned last week for violations of the 3RR (which I feel were unjust) and then again two days ago by another admin who mistook ongoing discussion (with this very user) for reverting. The discussion took place at ]. | |||
| * The admin who has placed the block did so based on an ongoing incident with me. This is a blatant COI. | |||
| * Irishguy has banned me based on his conclusion that I am a sock. He raised the issue ]. It is a false assumption and not well supported. Further, he failed to use ] and has made a number of false accusations. I simply want the opportunity to state my side of the story. I cannot do this without a ban. Seeing as he banned me, it seems he is trying to silence me. | |||
| * I have continued to better the information available on wikipedia based on the many policies already in place. As this very talk page displays, I am learning more and more about how things are done on here. //]}} | |||
| ::Contrary to his above assertion, Tecmo has been ignoring Wiki policies in a recidivist obsessive manner while maintaining a non-apologetic air. He claims that the directive to be Bold allows him to do so. He within a 3-day period this month was blocked 3 times by admins for 3RR violations, and has generally refused to adhere to consensus or reason. For a number of editors, including me, his activities have proven to be a significant distraction from positive contributions to Wiki. Admittedly, it is difficult to follow his admonitions from admins (and others) --inasmuch as he blanks his talk page repeatedly, and asks people not to discuss their problems with his behavior on his talk page. But a review of the following will give you some of the flavor: | |||
| *(cur) (last) 21:56, June 12, 2007 Yamla (Talk | contribs) (3,745 bytes) (Decline unblock, continued ranting) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 19:26, June 12, 2007 Kurykh (Talk | contribs) (1,762 bytes) (decline unblock) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 22:56, June 10, 2007 Tecmobowl (Talk | contribs) (7 bytes) (get some sense and stop instigating things - your are the poorest admin i have ever come across - don't worry, I'll address your sockpuppetry bs soon enough.) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 20:40, June 10, 2007 Heimstern (Talk | contribs) (1,033 bytes) (You have been blocked) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 15:26, June 10, 2007 Irishguy (Talk | contribs) (1,362 bytes) (warning) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 15:24, June 10, 2007 Tecmobowl (Talk | contribs) (847 bytes) (→Stop - how many idiots are there in one day?) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 15:20, June 10, 2007 Irishguy (Talk | contribs) (1,278 bytes) (warning) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 14:05, June 10, 2007 Nishkid64 (Talk | contribs) (1,539 bytes) (→Dispute - Add reply.) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 13:35, June 10, 2007 TigerShark (Talk | contribs) (468 bytes) (Dispute) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 13:17, June 10, 2007 Epeefleche (Talk | contribs) (261 bytes) (Impending WP:3RR violation at Kevin Youkilis) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 13:14, June 10, 2007 Epeefleche (Talk | contribs) (259 bytes) (Impending WP:3RR violation at Hideki Matsui) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 13:05, June 10, 2007 Epeefleche (Talk | contribs) (362 bytes) (User Warning -- Delete -- 4im) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 12:49, June 10, 2007 Epeefleche (Talk | contribs) (360 bytes) (User Warning Level 4 re continued deletions of baseball urls) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 12:39, June 10, 2007 Epeefleche (Talk | contribs) (1,303 bytes) (→Fangraph deletion - User Warning; Deletion; Level 3) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 11:41, June 7, 2007 E tac (Talk | contribs) (23,228 bytes) (→Blocked) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 01:41, June 7, 2007 Viridae (Talk | contribs) (22,931 bytes) (→Blocked - reply) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 00:49, June 7, 2007 Viridae (Talk | contribs) (22,711 bytes) (→Blocked - block eextended) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 00:47, June 7, 2007 Viridae (Talk | contribs) m (22,537 bytes) (→Impending WP:3RR violation at Homer Bailey - block notice) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 00:45, June 7, 2007 E tac (Talk | contribs) (21,971 bytes) (→Impending WP:3RR violation at Homer Bailey) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 00:45, June 7, 2007 E tac (Talk | contribs) (21,971 bytes) (→Impending WP:3RR violation at Homer Bailey) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 00:43, June 7, 2007 Tecmobowl (Talk | contribs) (21,016 bytes) (→Impending WP:3RR violation at Homer Bailey - removed a personal attack) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 00:39, June 7, 2007 E tac (Talk | contribs) (21,829 bytes) (→Impending WP:3RR violation at Homer Bailey) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 00:31, June 7, 2007 E tac (Talk | contribs) (21,512 bytes) (→Impending WP:3RR violation at Al Rosen) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 10:03, June 6, 2007 Alansohn (Talk | contribs) (21,016 bytes) (Impending WP:3RR violation at Al Rosen) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 23:13, June 5, 2007 Alansohn (Talk | contribs) (25,791 bytes) (re persistent ignorance of consensus) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 14:48, June 1, 2007 Epeefleche (Talk | contribs) (21,923 bytes) (→Your removal of urls with unique information/edit warring - Why do you assert that your talk page is not an acceptable place to discuss this matter?) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 09:01, May 29, 2007 Baseball Bugs (Talk | contribs) (9,536 bytes) (I have asked an admin...) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 20:58, October 28, 2006 Wknight94 (Talk | contribs) (banned) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 11:13, October 24, 2006 OBILI (Talk | contribs) m (→Vandalism warning DO NOT DELETE!) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 11:11, October 24, 2006 OBILI (Talk | contribs) (Vandalism warning DO NOT DELETE!) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 04:38, October 21, 2006 TV Newser (Talk | contribs) (reverted vandalism - User:Tecmobowl keeps blanking page to hide various warnings.) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 12:55, October 19, 2006 OBILI (Talk | contribs) (Warning) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 06:09, September 29, 2006 MER-C (Talk | contribs) m (JS: Reverted edits by Tecmobowl to last version by TV Newser) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 06:08, September 29, 2006 Tecmobowl (Talk | contribs) (LEAVE ME A LONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What the hell do you keep messing with me for) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 06:07, September 29, 2006 TV Newser (Talk | contribs) (rvv - I see you are trying to hide all the vandalism warnings.) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 20:18, September 11, 2006 Splash (Talk | contribs) (Baseball: warning) | |||
| *(cur) (last) 18:19, September 10, 2006 TBTA (Talk | contribs) (Vandalism warning) | |||
| --] 21:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC) | |||