| Revision as of 18:13, 7 July 2007 editFilll (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,790 edits Please try to be reasonable← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:23, 7 July 2007 edit undoFilll (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,790 edits →Please try to be reasonableNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| An edit war like you seem to be engaged in on ] will not serve your purposes. You will only get your changes undone, and possibly get yourself blocked or banned for your trouble. You are currently in violation and I suspect can be blocked at any time now. I am asking you nicely, and trying to help you out. If you want major changes, try to get consensus first on the talk page. If you can get consensus, and other editors agree, then the changes can be implemented. Please try not to be so disruptive.--] 18:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | An edit war like you seem to be engaged in on ] will not serve your purposes. You will only get your changes undone, and possibly get yourself blocked or banned for your trouble. You are currently in violation and I suspect can be blocked at any time now. I am asking you nicely, and trying to help you out. If you want major changes, try to get consensus first on the talk page. If you can get consensus, and other editors agree, then the changes can be implemented. Please try not to be so disruptive.--] 18:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Escalating warnings for ]== | |||
| ] You are in danger of violating the ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:creation science| on ]}}. Please cease further reverts or you may be ] from editing.<!-- {{uw-3rr3}} --> You cannot use ]s to avoid this rule.--] 19:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:23, 7 July 2007
Please do not continue to insert non-reliable sources like Anwers in Genesis, as you have done on the Homo floresiensis page here and here . Repeated addition of material that does not come from reliable sources may be considered edit warring, and could lead to you being blocked. Edhubbard 22:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Creation science. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Silly rabbit 14:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, you will be blocked from editing.
In regards to your claims of vandalism on the Creation Science page, Misplaced Pages policy specifically states that neither Bold Edits nor Stubbornness can be considered as vandalism. The changes made do not fall under any category of what constitutes vandalism.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Creation science. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Silly rabbit 18:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Please try to be reasonable
An edit war like you seem to be engaged in on creation science will not serve your purposes. You will only get your changes undone, and possibly get yourself blocked or banned for your trouble. You are currently in violation and I suspect can be blocked at any time now. I am asking you nicely, and trying to help you out. If you want major changes, try to get consensus first on the talk page. If you can get consensus, and other editors agree, then the changes can be implemented. Please try not to be so disruptive.--Filll 18:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Escalating warnings for creation science
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on creation science. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. You cannot use sock puppets to avoid this rule.--Filll 19:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)