| Revision as of 12:07, 30 May 2005 view source212.174.172.146 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:15, 6 June 2005 view source SouthernComfort (talk | contribs)6,757 editsm cleaned up articleNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Overview == | == Overview == | ||
| ] is an ethnically diverse state. The major ethno-linguistic groups include the ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] as well as others. While many of these groups are urbanized and often mixing, particularly in larger cities, some |
] is an ethnically diverse state. The major ethno-linguistic groups include the ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] as well as others. While many of these groups are urbanized and often mixing together, particularly in larger cities, some continue functioning as rural ]. | ||
| Many of these ethnic groups have their own ], ], and often ]. Their differences occasionally emerge as political ambitions. Some of these groups are also ]. | Many of these ethnic groups have their own ]s, ]s, and often ]. Their differences occasionally emerge as political ambitions. Some of these groups are also ]. | ||
| One of the major internal policy challenges during the centuries up until now for most or all Iranian governments has been to find the appropriate and |
One of the major internal policy challenges during the centuries up until now for most or all Iranian governments has been to find the appropriate and balanced approach to the difficulties and opportunities caused by this diversity, particularly as this internal diversity has often been readily utilized by foreign powers. | ||
| == Current Policy == | == Current Policy == | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| Many Iranian provinces have ] and ] stations in local language or dialect. School education is in ], the Iranian ], but use of ]s is allowed under the ]. | Many Iranian provinces have ] and ] stations in local language or dialect. School education is in ], the Iranian ], but use of ]s is allowed under the ]. | ||
| Many members of ethnic minorities have made a successful political career. Most provincial governors |
Many members of ethnic minorities have made a successful political career. Most provincial governors and many members of the local ruling classes and clergy are members of the relevant ethnic groups. Many, if not most, members of the national cultural and political elite have mixed roots. | ||
| Separatist tendencies, led |
Separatist tendencies, led by the ] or ] in ], for example, have led to frequent unrest and occasional military crackdown. | ||
| Similar tendencies, but on smaller scale in |
Similar tendencies, but on smaller scale in other provinces such as ], ] and ] required occasionally suppression by police and other security measures. | ||
| == Historical Notes == | == Historical Notes == | ||
| Iran (then called ]) traditionally was governed over the last few centuries in a fairly decentralised way with much regional and local autonomy. In particular, weaker members of the ] often did not rule much beyond the capital ], a fact exploited by the imperial powers ] and ] in the ]. | |||
| ] and to a lesser degree his son ], successfully strengthened the central government by using reforms, bribes and suppressions. |
], and to a lesser degree his son ], successfully strengthened the central government by using reforms, bribes and suppressions. The ]s, ], ], and until the late ], also some of the ] speaking Azeri regions required persistent military measures to keep them under governmental control. | ||
| == External links == | == External links == | ||
Revision as of 08:15, 6 June 2005
Overview
Iran is an ethnically diverse state. The major ethno-linguistic groups include the Persians, Azeris, Kurds, Turkmen people, Baluchi, Qashqai, Bakhtiari, Arab, Jewish, Armenian, Assyrian as well as others. While many of these groups are urbanized and often mixing together, particularly in larger cities, some continue functioning as rural tribal societies.
Many of these ethnic groups have their own languages, cultures, and often literature. Their differences occasionally emerge as political ambitions. Some of these groups are also religious minorities.
One of the major internal policy challenges during the centuries up until now for most or all Iranian governments has been to find the appropriate and balanced approach to the difficulties and opportunities caused by this diversity, particularly as this internal diversity has often been readily utilized by foreign powers.
Current Policy
The current governmental policy can be characterised by a mixture of celebrating and furthering cultural diversity under a joint Iranian national umbrella, while holding down (occasionally violently) political separatism. Some ethnic minorities have reported racial or religious discrimination.
Many Iranian provinces have radio and television stations in local language or dialect. School education is in Persian, the Iranian official language, but use of regional languages is allowed under the constitution of the Islamic Republic.
Many members of ethnic minorities have made a successful political career. Most provincial governors and many members of the local ruling classes and clergy are members of the relevant ethnic groups. Many, if not most, members of the national cultural and political elite have mixed roots.
Separatist tendencies, led by the Kurdish Democratic Party of Iran or Komalah in Kurdistan, for example, have led to frequent unrest and occasional military crackdown.
Similar tendencies, but on smaller scale in other provinces such as Baluchistan, Khuzestan and Iranian Azerbaijan required occasionally suppression by police and other security measures.
Historical Notes
Iran (then called Persia) traditionally was governed over the last few centuries in a fairly decentralised way with much regional and local autonomy. In particular, weaker members of the Qajar dynasty often did not rule much beyond the capital Tehran, a fact exploited by the imperial powers Britain and Russia in the 19th century.
Reza Shah Pahlavi, and to a lesser degree his son Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, successfully strengthened the central government by using reforms, bribes and suppressions. The Bakhtiaris, Lurs, Kurds, and until the late 1940s, also some of the Turkish speaking Azeri regions required persistent military measures to keep them under governmental control.
External links
- website of the Komalah, a Marxist guerilla movement, mostly Kurdish, active in Western Iran
- Website about KDPI
- On Ahvaz/Khuzestan separatist tendencies