Revision as of 03:48, 6 August 2007 editSherurcij (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers36,146 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:38, 16 January 2008 edit undoSaforrest (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,512 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Notable Wikipedian|Zaynab Khadr|Khadr, Zaynab|editedhere=yes}} | {{Notable Wikipedian|Zaynab Khadr|Khadr, Zaynab|editedhere=yes}} | ||
== Notability == | |||
With regard to BWH76's flagging this as non-notable: | |||
Zaynab Khadr's claim to notability does not ride entirely on the shoulders of her brothers. Granted, she is not the household name in Canada that ] or ] are, but I think that her being the subject of numerous television interviews along with the Osama bin Laden connection makes this subject pass the litmus test of notability. | |||
To be specific about it, I believe that taken together the CBC article, the CityNews article, and the Canberra Times article constitute evidence that the subject ] | |||
I realize the argument is not so much whether all this information should be deleted, but instead about whether it should be here or in the ] article. Independent of the issue of notability which I mentioned above which I think serves as a compelling enough reason for a separate article, I think there is already more than enough to discuss in the ] article. --] (]) 20:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:38, 16 January 2008
Biography Redirect‑class | |||||||
|
The following Misplaced Pages contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Notability
With regard to BWH76's flagging this as non-notable:
Zaynab Khadr's claim to notability does not ride entirely on the shoulders of her brothers. Granted, she is not the household name in Canada that Abdurahman Khadr or Omar Khadr are, but I think that her being the subject of numerous television interviews along with the Osama bin Laden connection makes this subject pass the litmus test of notability.
To be specific about it, I believe that taken together the CBC article, the CityNews article, and the Canberra Times article constitute evidence that the subject "has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject."
I realize the argument is not so much whether all this information should be deleted, but instead about whether it should be here or in the Khadr family article. Independent of the issue of notability which I mentioned above which I think serves as a compelling enough reason for a separate article, I think there is already more than enough to discuss in the Khadr family article. --Saforrest (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Categories: