Revision as of 13:19, 11 June 2005 editCesarB (talk | contribs)Administrators14,429 edits Vandalizing user pages← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:47, 13 June 2005 edit undoGuy Montag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,116 edits →Vandalizing user pagesNext edit → | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
Kindly refrain from vandalizing my user page. It is NOT appreciated.] 07:32, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) | Kindly refrain from vandalizing my user page. It is NOT appreciated.] 07:32, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) | ||
:Sorry, I thought I was doing the opposite; I saw an abusive anonymous user blank your user page, and reverted it. --] 13:19, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) | :Sorry, I thought I was doing the opposite; I saw an abusive anonymous user blank your user page, and reverted it. --] 13:19, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) | ||
==New User== | |||
I am sure it's not a sockpuppet, but if he is a bad faith editor, he will be dealt with sooner or later. Keep me updated if possible. Where does he edit? | |||
Regards, | |||
] 05:47, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:47, 13 June 2005
RFAr
I am opening a request for arbitration against you due to your persistent use of personal attacks and sockpuppets. Firebug 16:34, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- You should be advised that I have left my comments in the KaintheScion/ElKabong RFAr.
- You should also be advised that I have yet to be convinced that these two are actually sockpuppets.
- I further object to being named in this RFAr at all, as it is an obvious indication to me that the whole thing has been enacted in bad faith by a group of editors pushing a political agenda. That you did so without so much as sending me a message or an email is very bad form on your part. Enviroknot
Personal attacks
Personal attacks can be removed altogether; people have been polite so far in merely editing out the unacceptable parts. If you want your comments to remain (and to remain unedited), then keep the lid on your emotions. It's really that simple. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 07:54, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
Sockpuppet Shenanigans
Firebug and Mel Etitis keep trying to tag your user page with a sockpuppet notice. I have now removed it twice. [edited by Whig for language and WP:NPA
You should know they'll probably continue, will do anything then can to try to attack anyone who doesn't share their POV-pushing ways. ElKabong [edited by Whig for language and WP:NPA
- While I do not appreciate your language, I understand now why you are so upset.
- To Mel Etitis: YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED to edit either my User page or my Talk page. Period. Enviroknot
3RR
You have been reported for a 3RR violation at Neofascism and religion and have been blocked from editing for 24 hours. If you feel this block is unfair, please feel free to e-mail me using the link on my user page. SlimVirgin 04:43, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
Sockpuppets and edit wars
I didn't say you were a sockpuppet, I said ElKabong was the same editor as KaintheScion; why would you imagine I was referring to you? As for User:Yuber, yes, he does little but edit-war on Muslim/Arab related topics, but that's not relevant to my comment on the Talk: page. Jayjg 21:28, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
3RR
I have reported you for violation of the 3RR.Yuber 21:32, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
3RR block
You have been reported for a 3RR violation at Dhimmi and have been blocked from editing for 24 hours. If you feel this block is unfair, please feel free to e-mail me using the link on my user page. SlimVirgin 22:00, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
Arbitration Committee case opening
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/KaintheScion et al. has been accepted and is now open. Please bring evidence to Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/KaintheScion et al./Evidence. Thank you. -- sannse (talk) 18:41, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
Personal attacks
What you wrote on Mel Etitis' talk page was, without shadow of a doubt, a personal attack. As per Misplaced Pages policy, please do not make them. Cheers, smoddy 20:13, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I suggest that you do not make assertions such as this. Much as it is easy to rise to such accusations, you will gain far more respect from the Misplaced Pages community if you protest your innocence while remaining within policy. Mel's behaviour, while perhaps a little inflammatory, is nonetheless within policy. Your personal attack isn't, whatever you may hope. Don't do it: convince the Misplaced Pages community of your good faith by acting in a suitable manner. smoddy 20:28, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I understand your upset. Misplaced Pages does tend to favour the people who accuse others of sockpuppetry. I can see no evidence for your being anything other than a good faith editor. Don't be downhearted about this, but you should really not rise to it. If the ArbComm are worth their salt, they will find no evidence that you are a sockpuppet. The sockpuppet template should be restricted to those who are clearly sockpuppets, not merely accused. I believe that Mel's actions probably constitute a personal attack, but I suggest that you try not to fight fire with fire. It will make Wikipedians far more amenable to your cause. smoddy 20:51, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Arbitration
Thank you for your help.
I suggest you use Jayjg's message to you about Yuber being a revert warmonger in the arbcom page.
Thanks again,
Guy Montag 05:54, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
My comment
Please note that I was not making a comment necessarily directed specifically at you, but to those users who've been revert warring on your page. → Ingoolemo ← 02:35, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
Vandalizing user pages
Kindly refrain from vandalizing my user page. It is NOT appreciated.Enviroknot 07:32, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought I was doing the opposite; I saw an abusive anonymous user blank your user page, and reverted it. --cesarb 13:19, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
New User
I am sure it's not a sockpuppet, but if he is a bad faith editor, he will be dealt with sooner or later. Keep me updated if possible. Where does he edit?
Regards,
Guy Montag 05:47, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)