| Revision as of 23:42, 21 August 2007 editTenebrae (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users155,424 edits Barker← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:44, 21 August 2007 edit undoIrishguy (talk | contribs)45,851 edits →Clive Barker sites: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
| ==Clive Barker sites== | ==Clive Barker sites== | ||
| You seem to be erasing two legitimate Clive Barker sites used as references for various articles, including some articles for which I can personally vouch has having use those sites. I'd like to show good faith that you are not simply removing these sites out of a dislike for the author Barker. You are, however, methodically erasing these through Misplaced Pages, and I'm not sure how one can be confident that they were never used as reference. Any talk-page explanation on these sites would be appropriate; saying just "linkspam" doesn't fully give reasoning regarding what seem to be standard non-commercial websites. Thanks. --] 23:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | You seem to be erasing two legitimate Clive Barker sites used as references for various articles, including some articles for which I can personally vouch has having use those sites. I'd like to show good faith that you are not simply removing these sites out of a dislike for the author Barker. You are, however, methodically erasing these through Misplaced Pages, and I'm not sure how one can be confident that they were never used as reference. Any talk-page explanation on these sites would be appropriate; saying just "linkspam" doesn't fully give reasoning regarding what seem to be standard non-commercial websites. Thanks. --] 23:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :A year ago ] simply spammed these links into about fifty article. No content was added, simply the highly promotional link about the link having a ''archive of fascinating comment''. In Clive Barker's article...fine. In the fifty other articles they were spammed into...no. <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 23:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:44, 21 August 2007
| Please leave a new message. |
 Archives |
*/Archive 1: July, 2005 – June, 2006 */Archive 2: June 2-3, 2006 */Archive 3: June 3-20, 2006 */Archive 4: June 30 – July 18, 2006 */Archive 5: July 19 - September 8, 2006 */Archive 6: September 9 - October 5, 2006 */Archive 7: October 7 - November 26, 2006 */Archive 8: November 27, 2006 - February 12, 2007 */Archive 9: February 13, 2007 - March 3, 2007 */Archive 10: March 3, 2007 - March 11, 2007 */Archive 11: March 11, 2007 - April 1, 2007 */Archive 12: April 1, 2007 - April 9, 2007 */Archive 13: April 9, 2007 - April 28, 2007 */Archive 14: April 29, 2007 - May 14, 2007 */Archive 15: May 15, 2007 - May 23, 2007 */Archive 16: May 23, 2007 - June 15, 2007 */Archive 17: June 15, 2007 - July 8, 2007 */Archive 18: July 8, 2007 - August 2, 2007 */Archive 19: August 2, 2007 - August 19, 2007 |
Feel free to leave comments at the bottom of the page.
- Please sign your comments with ~~~~.
- If you are here to complain about something I deleted please tell me the name of the specific article.
It should go without saying that trolling, vandalism, and personal attacks will be promptly removed. Thanks. IrishGuy
203.89.172.130
thanks for blocking this vandal Jru Gordon 02:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. :) IrishGuy 02:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
170.215.153.80
There is a guy on this IP who makes random changes to Transformers articles which are nonsensical. I have to constantly monitor it and revert them. Can he be blocked? user_talk:mathewignash —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 02:51, August 20, 2007 (UTC).
- He hasn't received any warnings for vandalism. You can find warning templates at WP:UTM and if he persists, you can report him at WP:AIV. IrishGuy 02:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Wrestling
Why are you deleting my articles? i'm just doing this for my wrestling association
please answer —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bergurking (talk • contribs) 19:04, August 21, 2007 (UTC).
Bergurking 19:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC) do you know more about iceland then me frosti bergsson is an icelandic millionare bergur frostason is an icelandic wrestler and rwa is a wrestling promotion
answer me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bergurking (talk • contribs) 19:08, August 21, 2007 (UTC).
- Please read WP:COI. You shouldn't be writing about an organization you are affiliated with. Beyond that, you created a single sentence article about a person with no assertion of importance and no references at all. IrishGuy 19:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
Sir, It is evident that you don't want the other readers of wikipedia to see the content of that link. This links is evidently appropriate for the subject covered and presents an alternative view of the same subject treated here. The fact that it does not say that this document is a fraud bothers you, so you have made an excuse for it to remove it. You try to look cool, but you have been dishonest with me at worst or grossly negligent in your comments at best. Please provide a precise explanation why you want to censor this link (your response was merely a cut and paste of wikipedia policy and does not apply here, evidently). No alternative opinion or view is expressed in this document as it should be to keep it neutral. Regards. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.218.11.70 (talk)
- Removing spam isn't "censoring". It isn't a reliable source, it isn't even remotely neutral or encyclopedic. It is spam. Stop. IrishGuy 20:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
You are calling names but you refuse to respond. Labeling webistes "spam" does necessarily make them so. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.218.11.70 (talk) 20:56, August 21, 2007 (UTC)
- I did respond. The fact that you don't happen to like the response doesn't negate it. IrishGuy 21:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Clive Barker sites
You seem to be erasing two legitimate Clive Barker sites used as references for various articles, including some articles for which I can personally vouch has having use those sites. I'd like to show good faith that you are not simply removing these sites out of a dislike for the author Barker. You are, however, methodically erasing these through Misplaced Pages, and I'm not sure how one can be confident that they were never used as reference. Any talk-page explanation on these sites would be appropriate; saying just "linkspam" doesn't fully give reasoning regarding what seem to be standard non-commercial websites. Thanks. --Tenebrae 23:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- A year ago 85.210.225.157 simply spammed these links into about fifty article. No content was added, simply the highly promotional link about the link having a archive of fascinating comment. In Clive Barker's article...fine. In the fifty other articles they were spammed into...no. IrishGuy 23:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)