Misplaced Pages

User talk:CvyvvZkmSUDowVf: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:27, 22 August 2007 view sourceCvyvvZkmSUDowVf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,542 edits →Note: remove shit← Previous edit Revision as of 14:08, 23 August 2007 view source Hornplease (talk | contribs)9,260 edits WP:CivilNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:


:If such a section is included, the footnotes should be in a separate section entitled "Notes" or "Footnotes." Where an alphabetical list of references is provided, "short footnotes" may be used, where the footnotes contain only an author, perhaps title, and page number, without giving a full citation in the footnote itself.--] 04:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC) :If such a section is included, the footnotes should be in a separate section entitled "Notes" or "Footnotes." Where an alphabetical list of references is provided, "short footnotes" may be used, where the footnotes contain only an author, perhaps title, and page number, without giving a full citation in the footnote itself.--] 04:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

== ] ==

You better have a look at that as well. Wow. ] 14:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:08, 23 August 2007

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
Archiving icon
Archives

no archives yet (create)


Chef

McBride is a note with the page number that refers to the works cited section as per the academic citation style known as Chicago format used in most liberal arts writing, which is a suggested style for Misplaced Pages.--Christopher Tanner, CCC 14:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

There are plenty of well written articles cited in the way this article was, as noted on the Misplaced Pages citing format to be used, there is a suggestion to use Chicago format which is how the article was written. Below is an excerpt from the Misplaced Pages:Citing Sources article which clearly delineates a "Footnote" or shortened to "notes" section as well as "References" which is also phrased as "Works cited". In addition this article is worked on by WikiProject Food and Drink and as such, our format for articles is using the Chicago format which uses the "notes" and "works cited" headings. The inline citation style you are using is based on Harvard referencing.
From Misplaced Pages:Citing sources
Maintaining a separate "References" section in addition to "Notes"
It can be helpful when footnotes are used that a separate "References" section also be maintained, in which the sources that were used are listed in alphabetical order. With articles that have lots of footnotes, it can become hard to see after a while exactly which sources have been used, particularly when the footnotes also contain explanatory text. A References section, which lists citations in alphabetical order, helps readers to see at a glance the quality of the references used.
If such a section is included, the footnotes should be in a separate section entitled "Notes" or "Footnotes." Where an alphabetical list of references is provided, "short footnotes" may be used, where the footnotes contain only an author, perhaps title, and page number, without giving a full citation in the footnote itself.--Christopher Tanner, CCC 04:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

WP:Civil

You better have a look at that as well. Wow. Hornplease 14:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)